Students:Final outcome of student stakeholder mapping and analysis in the Ore Mountains: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 42: Line 42:
The next step was to analyse the various interactions and highlighting the different relationships between all the stakeholders. This creates what at first sight seems like a somewhat complicated map (see Fig. 2), even without every single interaction depicted, yet a closer reading revealed an elegant simplicity to the map which was able to be simplified further to demonstrate (see Fig. 3) the most critical relationships with the greatest impact on the region’s development.  
The next step was to analyse the various interactions and highlighting the different relationships between all the stakeholders. This creates what at first sight seems like a somewhat complicated map (see Fig. 2), even without every single interaction depicted, yet a closer reading revealed an elegant simplicity to the map which was able to be simplified further to demonstrate (see Fig. 3) the most critical relationships with the greatest impact on the region’s development.  
[[File:Fig 2 Summer School Case Study.jpg|thumb|Fig. 2]]
[[File:Fig 2 Summer School Case Study.jpg|thumb|Fig. 2]]
[[File:Fig 3. Summer School Case Study.jpg|thumb|Fig. 3]]
The first stage of the map involved mapping the obvious relationships and networking among specific stakeholders and briefly listing what their particular interest might be in that relationship. Examples (by no means exhaustive) were as follows:
The first stage of the map involved mapping the obvious relationships and networking among specific stakeholders and briefly listing what their particular interest might be in that relationship. Examples (by no means exhaustive) were as follows:


994

edits

Navigation menu