994
edits
Talk:Case study: Project ECOPROFIT: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Talk:Case study: Project ECOPROFIT (view source)
Revision as of 07:15, 4 October 2012
, 07:15, 4 October 2012no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
4 October 2012 | 4 October 2012 | ||
Well done on completing your assignment. You've used and created references well, and even managed to upload an image, so you can call yourselves qualified users of wiki now ;) The English needs some correcting, but overall it's understandable. | Well done on completing your assignment. You've used and created references well, and even managed to upload an image, so you can call yourselves qualified users of wiki now ;) The English needs some correcting, but overall it's understandable. | ||
Your case study is missing several points, however: | Your case study is missing several points, however: | ||
| Line 9: | Line 10: | ||
* the study reads like a marketing leaflet but with all details about how Okoprofit achieves its goals; some concrete examples would have helped to understand what exactly it is that Okoprofit does (a reader wouldn't know without following one of the links) | * the study reads like a marketing leaflet but with all details about how Okoprofit achieves its goals; some concrete examples would have helped to understand what exactly it is that Okoprofit does (a reader wouldn't know without following one of the links) | ||
* what's with the long list of city names?! This is superfluous information | |||
* | |||