Changing people's relationship to their environment: Difference between revisions

After the mid of 20th century people's relationship to their environment changed in the best part of the world. Original intact people's relationship to the landscape nearly disappeared in certain places. At most "territories of the northern hemisphere" is still maintained solely due to a foreseeing people and ancient culture. Although it is possible to encounter a surprising deepening of this bilateral connection of people and their environment from time to time - situation of the Austrian border region Styrian Vulkanland. Human activities could be for nature of high significance. People's relationship to the environment determines their effect on it. Possible change of this relationship will inevitably affect the landscape and its inhabitants. Virtually it does not matter too much whether in background of change is globalisation, even though that carries countless diverse specificities as loss of biodiversity, deteritorialisation, human time blur and suppression of geographically separated field's exceptionalities. It is us who literally decide about the future. Like an architect who indeed design the appearance of proposed house, not a software program.

The Beskids are specific by well visible difference between 40th years and today's period. People were far more linked with their environment in the first half of 20th century. At present the links are for the best part of dwellers rather subconscious and often viewed as "antiquated". But in a picture of current Beskids inhabitants also appeared a good and so needed links to nature and culture of Wallachia, delivering due to remarkable and well educated people a promising way forward. Light at times shines in a direction where we would expect it at least. In the case of areas like the Beskids is necessary to go back to ancient culture, nature, history and its own uniqueness. Local regions can after be supportive of people and deliver better sensitive future.