Talk:Emissions Trading: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:
Dear Frank,
Dear Frank,


Thank you for your effort - seems that you have studied the theme quite in depth after all, and hope that you have an insight to it now. My comments are mostly for your future writing - so that you have reflected experience from our course.
Thank you for your effort - seems that you have studied the theme quite in depth after all, and hope that you have an insight to it now. My comments are mostly for your future writing - so that you reflect experience from our course.


I have spent a lot of time reading your article, and must say that I have lost myself several times. I think that you still use too much citations – you rely on thoughts of somebody else, and your own text only illustrates and interconnects them. That disrupts the logic – you never finish one idea, and often repeat something twice. Also, you start with German situation, some facts about periods of the trading process, and do not say what is it all about. Then follows the chapter “Introduction to the Carbon market” which provides very basic introduction and should be in the beginning – it is somewhere after very specified information.
I have spent a lot of time reading your article (I must say that I have lost myself several times as it was not easy to follow your thoughts :-)). You have brouth a lot of infomation about the problem, although it is still little bit fragmentary. I think that you still use too much citations – you rely on thoughts of somebody else, and your own text only illustrates and interconnects them. That disrupts the logic – you sometimes do not finish one idea, or repeat something twice. Also you might not discover what is the most important in some cases - e.g. you start with German situation, introduce some facts about periods of the trading process, but do not say what is it all about. Then follows the chapter “Introduction to the Carbon market” which provides very basic introduction and should be in the beginning – but now it is somewhere after very specified information.


Also you are not very consistent with the case study genre – you speak almost exclusively about very general principles, and the illustration on real case is restricted.
Also you are not very consistent with the case study genre – you speak almost exclusively about very general principles, and the illustration on real case is restricted.
445

edits