Does the globalization of media lead to homogenization?: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 25: Line 25:
==Conclusion==
==Conclusion==


As a conclusion, it's the perception that matters. Optimists stand for the "new diversity", pessimists for "homogenization".
As a conclusion, it's the perception that matters. In fact, the world grew together because of the globalization of media. Through the news at the television, the internet and also the radio we know what is happening at the other end of the world at any time. The images in the television are suggestive of experiencing the event directly. That leads to a new closeness and feeling of togetherness. Everything is near and that leads us to a sensibility concerning catastrophes. It's also easier to help when something happened in another place because we know about it. “Homogenization or a new variety regarding the individual cultures?” Looking at the world, people may see a big diversity, new possibilities but also many different cultures. There's no destroying of individual countries and their cultures but a huge assortment in cinema, stores and also the internet. The assortment seems to be unlimited and that what the globalization of media stands for: "unlimited possibilities"


==See also==
==See also==
40

edits

Navigation menu