994
edits
Students:Case study methodology: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Students:Case study methodology (view source)
Revision as of 11:01, 24 October 2012
, 11:01, 24 October 2012no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 59: | Line 59: | ||
7. Interaction analysis – analysis of relationships and interactions in the mind map | 7. Interaction analysis – analysis of relationships and interactions in the mind map | ||
8. System analysis of the social relations (place is one of the elements of the system) | 8. System analysis of the social relations (place is one of the elements of the system) | ||
* Structural | |||
* From the viewpoint of relations between elements and processes | |||
9. Reframing workshop: 3 perspectives applied on the case study and mind maps. Relevant projects and scenarios outlined. | 9. Reframing workshop: 3 perspectives applied on the case study and mind maps. Relevant projects and scenarios outlined. | ||
10. Scenario analysis – introductory steps | 10. Scenario analysis – introductory steps | ||
VI. '''Students’ work – STEPS:''' | |||
1. Collaborative work I: | |||
identify actors in the network, think about system of relations | |||
* experiences from e-learning | |||
Identify important aspects of the network from the point of view of SC (trust etc.) | |||
2. Group work I (GW I) – '''stakeholder mapping''' workshop: | |||
forming of actor groups, role-playing one of the actors + creation of the „knowledge base“ for the role of actor: | |||
* Draw a map of actors, analyse and identify uncertainties to be explored | |||
* Mental mapping of the situation – relations of the group (one of the actors) to other actors | |||
* Interrelations of other actors | |||
3. Group and Collaborative work II – '''case study writing:''' | |||
* How to interview real actors | |||
* Case study writing on behalf of an interest group, with input of the interviews real actors | |||
4. Group work II (GW II) – '''comparative study''' of relationships on the German side of the border | |||
Actor analysis focused on important aspects from the SC perspective (trust, relation to the place, etc.) | |||
* Actor analysis methodology revisited – SC focus | |||
* Analysis of the mental maps done by other “actors” in GW I | |||
* Start with analysing of the input produced by real actors | |||
* Comparison with German situation | |||
5. Collaborative work III – '''actor analysis''' of the stakeholder map produced: | |||
Put together results done by “actors”: students’ groups | |||
* Relations between stakeholder maps produced by students in groups, and combining stakeholders maps into one | |||
* Analysis of actors’ relationships, based on concept of ‘vital interests’ (see below) | |||
* Analysis of actors’ relationships, based on concept of ‘superstructure options’ (see below) | |||
* Find common interests and conflicts in scenarios done by different actors (from SWOT analyses) | |||
6. Group work III – '''reframing workshop:''' | |||
Identification of potential regional projects | |||