445
edits
Social capital: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
no edit summary
Jana Dlouha (talk | contribs) (page created) |
Jana Dlouha (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
The core intuition guiding social capital re-search is that the goodwill that others have to-ward us is a valuable resource. By 'goodwill' we refer to the sympathy, trust, and forgiveness offered us by friends and acquaintances… If goodwill is the substance of social capital, its effects flow from the information, influence, and solidarity such goodwill makes available. … these benefits are accompanied by costs and risks.<ref name=Adler>Adler, P. S., & Kwon, S. W. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of management review, 17–40.</ref> | The core intuition guiding social capital re-search is that the goodwill that others have to-ward us is a valuable resource. By 'goodwill' we refer to the sympathy, trust, and forgiveness offered us by friends and acquaintances… If goodwill is the substance of social capital, its effects flow from the information, influence, and solidarity such goodwill makes available. … these benefits are accompanied by costs and risks.<ref name=Adler>Adler, P. S., & Kwon, S. W. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of management review, 17–40.</ref> | ||
== Definition == | |||
Social capital is the goodwill available to individuals or groups. Its source lies in the structure and content of the actor's social relations. Its effects flow from the 'information, influence, and solidarity it makes available to the actor'<ref name=Adler></ref>. | |||
== Social structure == | == Social structure == | ||
…we can differentiate social capital from other types of resources by the specific dimension of social structure underlying it; social capital is the resource available to actors as a function of their location in the structure of their social relations. But what are 'social relations'? We can distinguish conceptually among '''three dimensions of social structure''', each rooted in different types of relations: | …we can differentiate social capital from other types of resources by the specific dimension of social structure underlying it; social capital is the resource available to actors as a function of their location in the structure of their social relations. But what are 'social relations'? We can distinguish conceptually among '''three dimensions of social structure''', each rooted in different types of relations: | ||
#'''market relations''', in which products and services are exchanged for money or bartered, | |||
#'''hierarchical relations''', in which obedience to authority is exchanged for material and spiritual security, and | |||
#'''social relations''', in which favors and gifts are exchanged. It is this third type of relationship that constitutes the dimension of social structure underlying social capital<ref name=Adler></ref>. | |||
== Relationship with other forms of capital == | == Relationship with other forms of capital == | ||
Social capital resembles some kinds of capital and differs from others. First, like all other forms of capital, social capital is a long-lived asset into which other resources can be invested, with the expectation of a future (albeit uncertain) flow of benefits. Through investment in building their network of external relations, both individual and collective actors can augment their social capital and thereby gain benefits in the form of superior access to information, power, and solidarity; and by investing in the development of their internal relations, collective actors can strengthen their collective identity and augment their capacity for collective action. …And, like physical capital and human capital, but unlike financial capital, social capital needs maintenance. Social bonds have to be periodically renewed and reconfirmed or else they lose efficacy. Like human capital and some forms of public goods, such as knowledge, it normally grows and develops with use-for example, trust (which we argue is a key source of social capital)<ref name=Adler></ref>. | Social capital resembles some kinds of capital and differs from others. First, like all other forms of capital, social capital is a long-lived asset into which other resources can be invested, with the expectation of a future (albeit uncertain) flow of benefits. Through investment in building their network of external relations, both individual and collective actors can augment their social capital and thereby gain benefits in the form of superior access to information, power, and solidarity; and by investing in the development of their internal relations, collective actors can strengthen their collective identity and augment their capacity for collective action. …And, like physical capital and human capital, but unlike financial capital, social capital needs maintenance. Social bonds have to be periodically renewed and reconfirmed or else they lose efficacy. Like human capital and some forms of public goods, such as knowledge, it normally grows and develops with use-for example, trust (which we argue is a key source of social capital)<ref name=Adler></ref>. | ||
… like clean air and safe streets, but unlike many other forms of capital, some forms of social capital are 'collective goods' in that they are not the private property of those who benefit from them | … like clean air and safe streets, but unlike many other forms of capital, some forms of social capital are 'collective goods' in that they are not the private property of those who benefit from them. This characteristic makes social capital vulnerable to free-rider problems and the resulting 'tragedy of the commons' risks<ref name=Adler></ref>. | ||
== Benefits of social capital == | == Benefits of social capital == | ||
| Line 21: | Line 24: | ||
*Trustworthiness of the social environment | *Trustworthiness of the social environment | ||
Social capital in larger social aggregates has deep historical roots and, thus, should be treated as an exogenously given 'endowment', it is also, at least under some circumstances, 'constructible' through deliberate actions | Social capital in larger social aggregates has deep historical roots and, thus, should be treated as an exogenously given 'endowment', it is also, at least under some circumstances, 'constructible' through deliberate actions<ref name=Adler></ref>. | ||
== References == | == References == | ||
<references/> | <references/> | ||