445
edits
No edit summary |
Jana Dlouha (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
In the beginning our wishes and recommendations can be found. The second part of our paper is devoted to present our perspective on history of the region, its environment and nature, local people, traditions, religion, cross-border relations, accommodation, infrastructure, entertainment and available activities, art, architecture, food and local curiosities. This part is largely supposed to provide background data for the group work and its quality can be varying. | In the beginning our wishes and recommendations can be found. The second part of our paper is devoted to present our perspective on history of the region, its environment and nature, local people, traditions, religion, cross-border relations, accommodation, infrastructure, entertainment and available activities, art, architecture, food and local curiosities. This part is largely supposed to provide background data for the group work and its quality can be varying. | ||
== Priorities == | == Priorities == | ||
=== What are our wishes === | === What are our wishes === | ||
Line 21: | Line 17: | ||
A border region should offer a diverse good quality accommodation with great travel options. These services need to be easily accessible for local as well as foreign tourists, this includes infrastructure as well as information and a reliable regional transport system. | A border region should offer a diverse good quality accommodation with great travel options. These services need to be easily accessible for local as well as foreign tourists, this includes infrastructure as well as information and a reliable regional transport system. | ||
=== Recommendations === | === Recommendations === | ||
Line 29: | Line 24: | ||
Establishment of intercultural/ cross-border projects for enhancing foreign language skills especially for the tourism branch. | Establishment of intercultural/ cross-border projects for enhancing foreign language skills especially for the tourism branch. | ||
Imrovement of cities and villages appearance. | |||
We wish the improved quality of the environment as well. | We wish the improved quality of the environment as well. | ||
====Far-reaching problems==== | ====Far-reaching problems==== | ||
Line 39: | Line 33: | ||
*Functionalist architecture of new-build most an similar 70s skyscrapers. This region was “object” to important historic changes. | *Functionalist architecture of new-build most an similar 70s skyscrapers. This region was “object” to important historic changes. | ||
*The mountains have a changing history. They are rich of ores, minerals, water, wood and black coal by nature. But this is not obviously visible by tourists. A lot of explanation has to be made by guides or museums. Knowledge about history and environment would have to be transformed from scientific research into easily understandable tourist brochures. | *The mountains have a changing history. They are rich of ores, minerals, water, wood and black coal by nature. But this is not obviously visible by tourists. A lot of explanation has to be made by guides or museums. Knowledge about history and environment would have to be transformed from scientific research into easily understandable tourist brochures. | ||
== Topics of interest == | == Topics of interest == | ||
=== History === | === History === | ||
Line 66: | Line 56: | ||
====Target groups==== | ====Target groups==== | ||
Displaced people and their descendants. People with interests in hiking, geology, mining, history, etc. | Displaced people and their descendants. People with interests in hiking, geology, mining, history, etc. | ||
=== Environment === | === Environment === | ||
Line 77: | Line 66: | ||
* cross-country skiing locations | * cross-country skiing locations | ||
* artificial “Matylda” lake, located in northern Most, is an example of a re-cultivated mining area; the lake offers occasions of water sports and relaxing on the east side and for fishing on the west side. (Most official tourims website) | * artificial “Matylda” lake, located in northern Most, is an example of a re-cultivated mining area; the lake offers occasions of water sports and relaxing on the east side and for fishing on the west side. (Most official tourims website) | ||
====Shortcomings==== | ====Shortcomings==== | ||
Line 83: | Line 71: | ||
* destroyed landscape and “moon landscape” | * destroyed landscape and “moon landscape” | ||
* destroyed forests due to acidified soil/ acid rain during 80s/ 90s. Forest died on large scale or were clear cut because so heavily affected. Clear cutting also led to a seperation of ecosystems. | * destroyed forests due to acidified soil/ acid rain during 80s/ 90s. Forest died on large scale or were clear cut because so heavily affected. Clear cutting also led to a seperation of ecosystems. | ||
=== People, Traditions, Religion, Cross-border relations === | === People, Traditions, Religion, Cross-border relations === | ||
Line 103: | Line 90: | ||
====Cross-border relations==== | ====Cross-border relations==== | ||
Visitors coming to this region would be pleased to come at both sides of the border. From this reason tourism is the large opportunity for future co-operation of these areas. Unfortunately there is still a lack of language skills of the other language on both sides of the boarder (cp. (http://cdu-erzgebirge.de/2011-04/boehmisch-saechsische-tourismusregion-neue-qualitaet/ http://www.tschechien-portal.info/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=4021&mode=thread&order=0&thold=0). Solving this is considered an important step to a cross-boarder tourism cooperation. Possible corporations are from the field of wood production and wood carving. But also development planning would be better to be done mutually, especially for tourism interests. | Visitors coming to this region would be pleased to come at both sides of the border. From this reason tourism is the large opportunity for future co-operation of these areas. Unfortunately there is still a lack of language skills of the other language on both sides of the boarder (cp. (http://cdu-erzgebirge.de/2011-04/boehmisch-saechsische-tourismusregion-neue-qualitaet/ http://www.tschechien-portal.info/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=4021&mode=thread&order=0&thold=0). Solving this is considered an important step to a cross-boarder tourism cooperation. Possible corporations are from the field of wood production and wood carving. But also development planning would be better to be done mutually, especially for tourism interests. | ||
=== Accommodation and how to get there and around === | === Accommodation and how to get there and around === | ||
Line 109: | Line 95: | ||
The quality of accommodation in villages is not as good as in cities and local infrastructure is predominantly unsatisfactory. The regional transport needs to be at least at “attractive” level and similarly reliable. | The quality of accommodation in villages is not as good as in cities and local infrastructure is predominantly unsatisfactory. The regional transport needs to be at least at “attractive” level and similarly reliable. | ||
=== Entertainment and available activities === | === Entertainment and available activities === | ||
Line 135: | Line 120: | ||
*http://www.kreis-bruex.de/bruex-s/start-bruexs.htm (on Most, in german language) | *http://www.kreis-bruex.de/bruex-s/start-bruexs.htm (on Most, in german language) | ||
*http://www.mesto-most.cz/DE/vismo/dokumenty2.asp?id_org=101092&id=1048&p1=1102 (official homepage of Most, with cz, engl. and german version) | *http://www.mesto-most.cz/DE/vismo/dokumenty2.asp?id_org=101092&id=1048&p1=1102 (official homepage of Most, with cz, engl. and german version) | ||
=== Art, architecture, food and local curiosities === | === Art, architecture, food and local curiosities === | ||
Line 143: | Line 127: | ||
*http://www.tschechische-kueche.de/knoedel/ | *http://www.tschechische-kueche.de/knoedel/ | ||
*http://www.myczechrepublic.com/czech_culture/czech_cuisine.html | *http://www.myczechrepublic.com/czech_culture/czech_cuisine.html | ||
====Architecture==== | ====Architecture==== | ||
In the Most region, of course, Most is the biggest city. Besides, there are Litvínov and Jirkov. The old royal town Most with its ancient architecture is no longer visible, as the town was removed and rebuilt, due to mining activities. The changes of architecture within the time would be an interesting topic for architecture fans. This, as well as other chapters of history seem not be profoundly reappraised and information is not provided a lot. Little villages appear poorly maintained and predominantly their architecture is not very valuable. | In the Most region, of course, Most is the biggest city. Besides, there are Litvínov and Jirkov. The old royal town Most with its ancient architecture is no longer visible, as the town was removed and rebuilt, due to mining activities. The changes of architecture within the time would be an interesting topic for architecture fans. This, as well as other chapters of history seem not be profoundly reappraised and information is not provided a lot. Little villages appear poorly maintained and predominantly their architecture is not very valuable. | ||
== SWOT Analysis== | == SWOT Analysis== |
edits