Students:Tourists group: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Students:Tourists group (view source)

Revision as of 14:11, 8 September 2011

25 bytes removed ,  14:11, 8 September 2011
no edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
== Tourism in Ore Mountains ==
 
= Tourism in Ore Mountains =
 
 
 
 
== Priorities ==
 
* What are our wishes
* Recommendations
 
 
=== What are our wishes ===
 
For tourists the area needs to be attractive. This includes diverse offers of activities for different tourists. A well visible history of area is essential for us, like e.g. archaeological sites, ancient architecture, museums, various sites. Even presented history of coal extraction can be enchanting to us. We need the overall good image of the region thanks to the beautiful landscape, villages, cities and architectural heritage.
A diverse nature linked with well preserved landscape are main points of interest. But a revitalised or re-cultivated area can be interesting for us as well. Various well marked tourist trails - also connected with German side attract the sportive tourists. But for others recreation sites in re-cultivated land can be attractive as well - for example near the lake Matylda.
 
Local people should be welcoming and friendly to us. We search for a culturally rich area. We wish local people to be rich in their cultural traditions, crafts, skills and knowledge and to present them and their history and architecture to us. Wood carving, wood art, production of toys and other beautiful wooden products greatly attract us. We are often focused to visit religious sites as well as religious festivals. Visitors coming to this region would be pleased to visit both sides of the border. Co-operative trans-border tourist projects, like the UNESCO Montanregion Ezgebirge, is very essential for us. Therefore we would be very pleased if people from the area have foreign language skills.
A border region should offer a diverse good quality accommodation with great travel options. These services need to be easily accessible for local as well as foreign tourists, this includes infrastructure as well as information and a reliable regional transport system.
 
=== Recommendations ===
 
Creation of regional tourist package for first time tourists coming to this area. The obstacles might be smaller by not needing to search for accommodation, activities and sightseeing. The next time modular system can be used to individualize the holiday. Therefore an functional over all tourism marketing is necessary. To make booking easier, an internet based booking-system in various languages is useful.
Establishment of intercultural/ cross-border projects for enhancing foreign language skills especially for the tourism branch.
Betterment of cities and villages appearance.
We wish the improved quality of the environment as well.
 
''Far-reaching problems''
The mining activities have an health influence on workers as well as an on tourists.
Functionalist architecture of new-build most an similar 70s skyscrapers. This region was “object” to important historic changes.
The mountains have a changing history. They are rich of ores, minerals, water, wood and black coal by nature. But this is not obviously visible by tourists. A lot of explanation has to be made by guides or museums. Knowledge about history and environment would have to be transformed from scientific research into easily understandable tourist brochures.
 
 




Line 109: Line 141:
''Architecture''
''Architecture''
In the Most region, of course, Most is the biggest city. Besides, there are Litvínov and Jirkov. The old royal town Most with its ancient architecture is no longer visible, as the town was removed and rebuilt, due to mining activities. The changes of architecture within the time would be an interesting topic for architecture fans. This, as well as other chapters of history seem not be profoundly  reappraised and information is not provided a lot. Little villages appear poorly maintained and sometimes empty
In the Most region, of course, Most is the biggest city. Besides, there are Litvínov and Jirkov. The old royal town Most with its ancient architecture is no longer visible, as the town was removed and rebuilt, due to mining activities. The changes of architecture within the time would be an interesting topic for architecture fans. This, as well as other chapters of history seem not be profoundly  reappraised and information is not provided a lot. Little villages appear poorly maintained and sometimes empty
== Priorities ==
* Priorities - what are our wishes
* Recommendations
=== Priorities - what are our wishes ===
For tourists the area needs to be attractive. This includes diverse offers of activities for different tourists. A well visible history of area is essential for us, like e.g. archaeological sites, ancient architecture, museums, various sites. Even presented history of coal extraction can be enchanting to us. We need the overall good image of the region thanks to the beautiful landscape, villages, cities and architectural heritage.
A diverse nature linked with well preserved landscape are main points of interest. But a revitalised or re-cultivated area can be interesting for us as well. Various well marked tourist trails - also connected with German side attract the sportive tourists. But for others recreation sites in re-cultivated land can be attractive as well - for example near the lake Matylda.
Local people should be welcoming and friendly to us. We search for a culturally rich area. We wish local people to be rich in their cultural traditions, crafts, skills and knowledge and to present them and their history and architecture to us. Wood carving, wood art, production of toys and other beautiful wooden products greatly attract us. We are often focused to visit religious sites as well as religious festivals. Visitors coming to this region would be pleased to visit both sides of the border. Co-operative trans-border tourist projects, like the UNESCO Montanregion Ezgebirge, is very essential for us. Therefore we would be very pleased if people from the area have foreign language skills.
A border region should offer a diverse good quality accommodation with great travel options. These services need to be easily accessible for local as well as foreign tourists, this includes infrastructure as well as information and a reliable regional transport system.
=== Recommendations ===
Creation of regional tourist package for first time tourists coming to this area. The obstacles might be smaller by not needing to search for accommodation, activities and sightseeing. The next time modular system can be used to individualize the holiday. Therefore an functional over all tourism marketing is necessary. To make booking easier, an internet based booking-system in various languages is useful.
Establishment of intercultural/ cross-border projects for enhancing foreign language skills especially for the tourism branch.
Betterment of cities and villages appearance.
We wish the improved quality of the environment as well.
''Far-reaching problems''
The mining activities have an health influence on workers as well as an on tourists.
Functionalist architecture of new-build most an similar 70s skyscrapers. This region was “object” to important historic changes.
The mountains have a changing history. They are rich of ores, minerals, water, wood and black coal by nature. But this is not obviously visible by tourists. A lot of explanation has to be made by guides or museums. Knowledge about history and environment would have to be transformed from scientific research into easily understandable tourist brochures.
Deri
52

edits

Retrieved from "https://vcsewiki.czp.cuni.cz/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1975"

Navigation menu