445
edits
Jana Dlouha (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Jana Dlouha (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
== Final assessment == | == Final assessment == | ||
Dear Caro, congratulations! You have been working very precisely, I could rely on your deadlines (which had to be adjusted to your program). Your theme and approach (method) is good and you come to well justified conclusions. Anyway, you could provide slightly better context to the case in these conclusions - as suggested by reviewer and also me :-). | Dear Caro, congratulations! You have been working very precisely, I could rely on your deadlines (which had to be adjusted to your program). Your theme and approach (method) is good and you come to well justified conclusions. Anyway, you could provide slightly better context to the case in these conclusions - as suggested by reviewer and also me :-). That means, you might have also described more experiences taken from the case study than discussion of the Code of conduct. You have communicated with your reviewer quite a lot, which is good, but you did not accept any of his suggestions and improved only citations (as obvious from the page history). But generally I am very satisfied with your text, you have invested a lot of effort in it - it is proof read now and we might work with it further on (for posible publication). Best regards and good luck in future. | ||
--[[User:Jana Dlouha|Jana Dlouha]] 08:48, 12 March 2011 (CET) | --[[User:Jana Dlouha|Jana Dlouha]] 08:48, 12 March 2011 (CET) |
edits