445
edits
Talk:Shopping centres: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
no edit summary
Jana Dlouha (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Jana Dlouha (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== | __NOTOC__ | ||
=== Final assessment=== | |||
For the moment about 90 point as some formal requirements are still abandoned. Good luck with finishing the text! | |||
== Peer review of the case study (by Caroline Reibe) == | == Peer review of the case study (by Caroline Reibe) == | ||
| Line 133: | Line 127: | ||
March, 3rd, 2011 | March, 3rd, 2011 | ||
== Literature review == | |||
Well done literature review: includes meta-reflection that could be used in further stqages of your research procedure. | |||
I suggest that you concentrate in next step on description of the phenomenon using information from your resources. Then, you could write in a foreword (or amend your already written foreword) that this problem has many reasons: specify them as psychological, behavioral, economical etc. In conclusion you could say something about its negative effects. | |||
You still need to decide what you consider to be the main lesson learned from your case study. Something that you could share with the rest of the world pointing out that specific conditions described (CR situation) provide some valuable experience for the others. Economic and other reasons are global, but concrete manifestations have to do something with our conditions. | |||
--[[User:Jana Dlouha|Jana Dlouha]] 18:48, 22 January 2011 (CET) | |||