90
edits
Talk:Shopping centres: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Peer review of the case study: new section
Jana Dlouha (talk | contribs) (Created page with "== Literature review == Well done literature review: includes meta-reflection that could be used in further stqages of your research procedure. I suggest that you concentrate in...") |
(→Peer review of the case study: new section) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
--[[User:Jana Dlouha|Jana Dlouha]] 18:48, 22 January 2011 (CET) | --[[User:Jana Dlouha|Jana Dlouha]] 18:48, 22 January 2011 (CET) | ||
== Peer review of the case study == | |||
==Form for students' evaluation== | |||
- just copy and paste (from editing mode), and fill in you assessment in relevant column! | |||
{| border=1 | |||
| '''Criteria''' || '''High/Medium/Low''' || | |||
|- | |||
| '''Content'''|| 10 / 5 / 0 || | |||
|- | |||
| '''Context''' || || | |||
|- | |||
| '''Practical relevance''' || || | |||
|- | |||
| '''Focus''' || || | |||
|- | |||
| '''Clarity''' || || | |||
|- | |||
| '''Critical approach''' || || | |||
|- | |||
| '''Elaborateness (commitment) ''' || || | |||
|- | |||
| '''Individual input & risk-taking ''' || || | |||
|- | |||
| '''Reader's attractiveness''' || || | |||
|- | |||
| '''Formal features ''' || || | |||
|- | |||
| '''Total (points)''' || '''max 100''' || | |||
|} | |||
=== Written Comments for Author(s) === | |||
..................................................................................... | |||
=== General Recommendation for articles (highlight one option): === | |||
1. Acceptable as is | |||
2. Acceptable with minor modifications | |||
3. Might be accepted after major modifications | |||
4. Unacceptable (provide reasons): | |||
..................................................................................... | |||