94
edits
Students:2010/2011 student case studies: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Students:2010/2011 student case studies (view source)
Revision as of 22:40, 19 January 2011
, 22:40, 19 January 2011no edit summary
Cabejskova (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Cabejskova (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 74: | Line 74: | ||
*This source is rather broad and includes topics which are not closely related to my study case but is useful to gain a more general overview of the topic of construction. | *This source is rather broad and includes topics which are not closely related to my study case but is useful to gain a more general overview of the topic of construction. | ||
'''Planning analytical materials, City Development Authority Prague,''''''2008'''<br> | '''Planning analytical materials, City Development Authority Prague,'''''''''''2008'''<br> | ||
*"The Planning Analytical Materials of the City of Prague documentation is intended as material for the preparation of instruments and policies aimed at influencing land development." This set of documents assesses the curent state of land use and observes related conditions (economic, demographic), both in text and graphic version. The important outcome is the Assasment of the Balance between the pillars of sustainable development and the Dessignation of issues to be solved, which talks also about the diminuition of green areas because of retail construction. <br> | *"The Planning Analytical Materials of the City of Prague documentation is intended as material for the preparation of instruments and policies aimed at influencing land development." This set of documents assesses the curent state of land use and observes related conditions (economic, demographic), both in text and graphic version. The important outcome is the Assasment of the Balance between the pillars of sustainable development and the Dessignation of issues to be solved, which talks also about the diminuition of green areas because of retail construction. <br> | ||
*I appreciate this as an oficial governmental source of information to combine with the scientific perspectives. The main limitation is the absence of updates (this is the first edition and the 2010 isnt available yet) which disallows comparison and observation of progress.<br> | *I appreciate this as an oficial governmental source of information to combine with the scientific perspectives. The main limitation is the absence of updates (this is the first edition and the 2010 isnt available yet) which disallows comparison and observation of progress.<br> | ||