445
edits
Rubric for assessment of the text: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Rubric for assessment of the text (view source)
Revision as of 07:52, 25 November 2010
, 07:52, 25 November 2010no edit summary
Jana Dlouha (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
Jana Dlouha (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
| '''Individual input & risk-taking ''' || initiative in researching topic: originality of the theme, independent work with resources || some new perspectives, but some are replicated, insufficient initiative || description of the problem does not bring any new perspectives; conclusions not original; insufficient resources || || | | '''Individual input & risk-taking ''' || initiative in researching topic: originality of the theme, independent work with resources || some new perspectives, but some are replicated, insufficient initiative || description of the problem does not bring any new perspectives; conclusions not original; insufficient resources || || | ||
|- | |- | ||
| '''Formal features ''' || respecting academic genre: proper length of paragraphs, sufficient titles and subtitles, sources properly cited in the text and in the list of references – citation format respected || | | '''Formal features ''' || respecting academic genre: proper length of paragraphs, sufficient titles and subtitles, sources properly cited in the text and in the list of references – citation format respected || no clear genre and structure, citation +/- OK || mixed genre, titles and subtitles insufficient, sources not properly cited in the text, citation format not correct || || | ||
no clear genre and structure, citation +- OK | |||
|- | |- | ||
| '''Reaction on the peer review ''' || reviewer’s comments respected fully – or left out those which are not relevant – in which case an explanation is provided in the discussion || || reviewer’s comments not respected || || | | '''Reaction on the peer review ''' || reviewer’s comments respected fully – or left out those which are not relevant – in which case an explanation is provided in the discussion || || reviewer’s comments not respected || || | ||