71
edits
Talk:Media and culture in a globalized world: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Talk:Media and culture in a globalized world (view source)
Revision as of 19:42, 23 January 2010
, 19:42, 23 January 2010no edit summary
(Created page with 'Dear Corinna, It is a pleasure to read your article. It is interesting and also your style of writing makes big sense and because you are really able to express your thoughts ve…') |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
1. Basic criteria | |||
1.1. Relevance of the subject to the general theme ('''High'''/Medium/Low) | |||
1.2. Coherence of the content with the title and thesis (High/'''Medium'''/Low) | |||
1.3. Quality of the content from the methodological point of view (see below) (High/'''Medium'''/Low) | |||
1.4. Quality of the text from the formal point of view (see below) ('''High'''/Medium/Low) | |||
2. Summary Comments for Author(s) | |||
2.1. Contribution to theory or practice ('''High'''/Medium/Low) | |||
2.2. Originality of the paper (High/'''Medium'''/Low) | |||
2.3. Adequate references to prior and related works by other authors (High/'''Medium'''/Low) | |||
2.4. Accurate information ('''Yes'''/No) | |||
2.5. Current information ('''Yes'''/No) | |||
2.6. Methodology ('''Yes'''/No) | |||
2.7. Writing style is generally ('''Excellent'''/Readable/Poor) | |||
2.7.1. Paper is logically organised ('''Yes'''/No) | |||
2.7.2. Ideas are clearly presented ('''Yes'''/No) | |||
2.8. Meets submission requirements (abstract, length, style, citation rules) ('''Yes'''/No) | |||
3. Written Comments for Author(s) | |||
Dear Corinna, | Dear Corinna, | ||
| Line 23: | Line 57: | ||
Regards | Regards | ||
Julia | Julia | ||
4. General Recommendation for articles (highlight one option): | |||
4.1. '''Publish as is''' with very very minor modifications | |||
4.2. Acceptable with minor modifications which you can read above | |||
4.3. Might be accepted after major modifications | |||
4.4. Unacceptable (select following option): | |||
4.4.1. Not appropriate for the content/theme of the Course | |||
4.4.2. Technically deficient | |||
4.4.3. Quality of presentation is poor | |||