445
edits
Talk:Security – global safety or collective danger?: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Talk:Security – global safety or collective danger? (view source)
Revision as of 09:43, 16 January 2010
, 09:43, 16 January 2010no edit summary
Jana Dlouha (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Jana Dlouha (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Paper title: Security – global safety or collective danger? == | Dear Josef your review is very good and includes comments on almost all important points. Main remark from my side is maybe the overall organization of the text – normally the review starts with outline of the article, its main pros and cons, then might be included more thorough analysis, conducted paragraph by paragraph, and only then you write about some specific problems related to it. So also the critique comes at the end of the review which might be more supportive for the author than if you start with it. Also, if you have read Ilknur´s review of your text, it is extremely polite and nice. | ||
It is good that you have realized all of the “mistakes” all of you could do in your in writing, the reviewed text is very good but I think that the “global security” is not too much related to the “individual perception of personal security” and so there are two themes which both could not have strong and interrelated conclusions (on such a small space). | |||
--[[User:Jana Dlouha|Jana Dlouha]] 08:43, 16 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
== Paper title: Security – global safety or collective danger? - Josef Nový== | |||
== 1. Basic criteria == | == 1. Basic criteria == | ||
| Line 55: | Line 60: | ||
--[[User:Kasparek|Kasparek]] 20:49, 13 January 2010 (UTC) | --[[User:Kasparek|Kasparek]] 20:49, 13 January 2010 (UTC) | ||
== Assessment from January 4th == | == Assessment from January 4th - Jana Dlouhá== | ||
Very thoughtful article, only minor remarks: | Very thoughtful article, only minor remarks: | ||