Talk:Justifiable Risk or headless Fear? The Difference between experienced and factual Disadvantages of a Process called Globalisation: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
Thank you for ideas of improvement!
The text is very good and I see now that strong conclusions could be written even if you are dealing with not very concrete issues. The idea of accepting global risks and necessity to act under the threats is perfect - you only need to make clear what is common weal as it is culturally or even historically specific (now it is probably attached to economical benefits for everybody).
I still have difficulty to understand the paragraphs "logically" as different reason and consequences are mixed. But the text would be a perfect introduction to the articles of others. Make sure that you point out the social dimension of your concern.
--[[User:Jana Dlouha|Jana Dlouha]] 13:19, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
=Peer-Review=
=Peer-Review=


Line 77: Line 68:
4.4.3. Quality of presentation is poor  
4.4.3. Quality of presentation is poor  


--[[User:Jule|Jule]] 11:40, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
== Assessment from January 4th ==
Remarks:
Dear Svea, your text is one of the best one in the course, you have done an excellent work and spent very much time even on details so that it is also formally very good. You are concerned with social problems in the first place, there could be much more topics in other areas (e.g. technology which is not understandable and is very powerful; global disasters such as environmental and health catastrophes etc.) You might speak explicitly about social dimension but it is OK – you have your personal viewpoint and this has developed considerably during your work.
--[[User:Jana Dlouha|Jana Dlouha]] 14:37, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
== Assessment from December 8th ==
Thank you for ideas of improvement!
The text is very good and I see now that strong conclusions could be written even if you are dealing with not very concrete issues. The idea of accepting global risks and necessity to act under the threats is perfect - you only need to make clear what is common weal as it is culturally or even historically specific (now it is probably attached to economical benefits for everybody).


--[[User:Jule|Jule]] 11:40, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
I still have difficulty to understand the paragraphs "logically" as different reason and consequences are mixed. But the text would be a perfect introduction to the articles of others. Make sure that you point out the social dimension of your concern.
 
--[[User:Jana Dlouha|Jana Dlouha]] 13:19, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
445

edits

Navigation menu