Talk:Security – global safety or collective danger?: Difference between revisions

Paper title: Security – global safety or collective danger?

1.1. Relevance of the subject to the general theme - High

1.2. Coherence of the content with the title and thesis - Medium

1.3. Quality of the content from the methodological point of view - High

1.4. Quality of the text from the formal point of view - Medium

2.1. Contribution to theory or practice - Medium

2.2. Originality of the paper - High

2.3. Adequate references to prior and related works by other authors - High

2.4. Accurate information - Yes

2.5. Current information - Yes

2.6. Methodology - Yes

2.7. Writing style is generally - Poor

2.7.1. Paper is logically organised - No

2.7.2. Ideas are clearly presented - Yes

2.8. Meets submission requirements (abstract, length, style, citation rules) - Yes

Before I get to the content of the work, I would like to comment on your writing style first. Unfortunately, your main weakness seems to be your English in connection with inattention. By inattention I mean spelling mistakes and missing letters at the end of words. If I start reading your essay and find two mistakes in the first two sentences („quiet“ and „of“ replaced by „if“), it does not make your writing very attractive. It is nothing that cannot be eliminated, but it makes a bad impression and disturbs the reader. When talking about your English, I mean some stylistic mistakes and some bad habits of yours. The most frequent one is that you constantly replace relative pronouns by „what“. You can use e.g. „that“ or „which“. You can easily avoid this, just check your text more carefully or have it checked.

Considering the content, the topic is very current and well chosen. The international as well as domestic security has developed into a serious problem. It is not only about the security at the airports and high-risk spots but also many other places where protecting people becomes rather invasion of privacy. The CCTV cameras you have mentioned appear to be the most significant example. I was shocked and a bit scared, when I came to the police station in the small town I live in (just about 10 000 inhabitants) and saw over thirty screens showing various spots from all over the town. I had no idea that we are being watched so much! All in all, the topic has to be considered completely suitable. If I get over some fluency deficiencies I have already mentioned, your thoughts are quite clearly expressed and I have understood everything although not after the first reading.

I really like the paragraph called „The necessity of solutions on the state and international level“ and the citation from Reinicke. Also your comments on the camera systems are absolutely true.

Might be accepted after minor modifications.