40
edits
Talk:Society and Globalization: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Talk:Society and Globalization (view source)
Revision as of 16:44, 8 January 2010
, 16:44, 8 January 2010no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
--[[User:Jana Dlouha|Jana Dlouha]] 11:56, 8 December 2009 (UTC) | --[[User:Jana Dlouha|Jana Dlouha]] 11:56, 8 December 2009 (UTC) | ||
Paper title: Society and Globalization | |||
| Line 11: | Line 13: | ||
1. Basic criteria | 1. Basic criteria | ||
1.1. Relevance of the subject to the general theme (High/Medium/Low) | 1.1. Relevance of the subject to the general theme (High/Medium/Low) '''high''' | ||
1.2. Coherence of the content with the title and thesis (High/Medium/Low) | 1.2. Coherence of the content with the title and thesis (High/Medium/Low) '''medium''' | ||
1.3. Quality of the content from the methodological point of view (see below) (High/Medium/Low).. | 1.3. Quality of the content from the methodological point of view (see below) (High/Medium/Low) '''high''' | ||
1.4. Quality of the text from the formal point of view (see below) (High/Medium/Low) '''high''' | |||
2. Summary Comments for Author(s) | 2. Summary Comments for Author(s) | ||
2.1. Contribution to theory or practice (High/Medium/Low) | 2.1. Contribution to theory or practice (High/Medium/Low) '''medium''' | ||
2.2. Originality of the paper (High/Medium/Low) | 2.2. Originality of the paper (High/Medium/Low) '''medium''' | ||
2.3. Adequate references to prior and related works by other authors (High/Medium/Low) | 2.3. Adequate references to prior and related works by other authors (High/Medium/Low) '''high''' | ||
2.4. Accurate information (Yes/No) | 2.4. Accurate information (Yes/No) '''high''' | ||
2.5. Current information (Yes/No) | 2.5. Current information (Yes/No) '''high''' | ||
2.6. Methodology (Yes/No) | 2.6. Methodology (Yes/No) '''high''' | ||
2.7. Writing style is generally (Excellent/Readable/Poor) | 2.7. Writing style is generally (Excellent/Readable/Poor) '''for the most part excellent, sometimes readable''' | ||
2.7.1. Paper is logically organised (Yes/No) | 2.7.1. Paper is logically organised (Yes/No) '''yes''' | ||
2.7.2. Ideas are clearly presented (Yes/No) .. | 2.7.2. Ideas are clearly presented (Yes/No) '''in between''' | ||
2.8. Meets submission requirements (abstract, length, style, citation rules) (Yes/No) '''yes''' | |||
3. Written Comments for Author(s) | 3. Written Comments for Author(s) | ||
4. General Recommendation for articles (highlight one option): | 4. General Recommendation for articles (highlight one option): | ||
| Line 49: | Line 54: | ||
4.1. Publish as is | 4.1. Publish as is | ||
4.2. Acceptable with minor modifications | 4.2. '''Acceptable with minor modifications''' | ||
4.3. Might be accepted after major modifications | 4.3. Might be accepted after major modifications | ||