The leading powers in the globalisation: Difference between revisions

The leading powers in the globalisation (view source)

Revision as of 17:57, 4 December 2009

146 bytes added , 17:57, 4 December 2009

no edit summary

Jana Dlouha

445

edits

@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 The leading powers are the most competitive. Countries able to dominate markets, dominate globalization. The key factor is price. A country able to compete in price dominates the market. China dominates the goods market offering the most competitive price. Countries able to offer the biggest quantity of oil for a competitive price dominate the market. The USA offers competitive price for its currency, Brazil dominates sugar and beef markets. The EU dominates most of the agricultural markets, since the final price is the result of costs and subsidies.
-Labor costs, environmental costs, energy costs, transportation costs, financial costs as well as direct and indirect expenditures, real costss and external cost, taxation, and subsidies play a role.
+Labor costs, environmental costs, energy costs, transportation costs, financial costs as well as direct and indirect expenditures, real costs and external cost, taxation, and subsidies play a role.
 The global free market can only exist if we are able to set up equal world prices. If in Europe we harm our production by the inclusion of environmental costs, we can never be competitive in paper production, in the production of steel, iron, glass. If environmental damage caused by the destruction of tropical forests is not part of the price of Brazilian sugar, we can not be competitive. Inasmuch as the US opened its market by the low price of the dollar, we can not compete with the Euro. Inasmuch as Kuwait and Saudi Arabia are able to produce crude oil for less than 20 USD per barrel, no one can compete. Iceland became important manufacturer of aluminum, since energy costs almost nothing, the very same holds true for Qatar.
@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 Some production needs high technology. Without the value added by high technology the production does not exist. Europe’s competitiveness presently relates to its intellectual property.
-To influence world trade to make it more just and equal we can only push for some clearer rules: external costs should be part of price. The price of environment and environmental damage should be accounted for. The price of energy should be part of the final price. Social and health costs should be part of labor costs. Resource exploitation – water, soil, coal, minerals, raw materials, should form a part of the cost. Subsidizing should be part of the cost…
+To influence world trade to make it more just and equal we can only push for some clearer rules: '''external costs should be part of price'''. The price of environment and environmental damage should be accounted for. The price of energy should be part of the final price. Social and health costs should be part of labor costs. Resource exploitation – water, soil, coal, minerals, raw materials, should form a part of the cost. Subsidizing should be part of the cost…
-The CAP is a clear example of bad management of EU resources. Instead of subsidizing technological development, research and science, the source of intellectual property, we subsidize wine, apples, and olives. Chinese market goods do not take into account import taxes, intellectual property, ILO labor standards, and causes damage to EU production. African exploitation of its raw material, inasmuch as Brazilian and Javans damage their rain forests, is not part of the price of exported sugar.
+The [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_Agricultural_Policy CAP] is a clear example of bad management of EU resources. Instead of subsidizing technological development, research and science, the source of intellectual property, we subsidize wine, apples, and olives. Chinese market goods do not take into account import taxes, intellectual property, ILO labor standards, and causes damage to EU production. African exploitation of its raw material, inasmuch as Brazilian and Javans damage their rain forests, is not part of the price of exported sugar.
-World trade management should go in the direction of global accountability and transparency. Protection of the environment, intellectual property protection, energy responsibility, respect for labor rights are world rules which  can guarantee a better future through globalization.
+World trade management should go in the direction of global accountability and transparency. Protection of the environment, intellectual property protection, energy responsibility, respect for labor rights are world rules which can guarantee a better future through globalization.
-EP is for instance responsible for African Caribbean Pacific – EU relations. The whole process of ACP trade agreements entered a new stage with the EPA – European Partnership Agreements. EPA negotiations lasted for years and took a lot of criticism. Europe should stand as a partner, not as a protector of its own market. It is not what usually happens.
+[http://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/public/default_en.htm EP] is for instance responsible for African Caribbean Pacific – EU relations. The whole process of [http://www.acpsec.org/ ACP] trade agreements entered a new stage with the EPA – European Partnership Agreements. EPA negotiations lasted for years and took a lot of criticism. Europe should stand as a partner, not as a protector of its own market. It is not what usually happens.
 The European Parliament should protect EU consumer health. The ability to limit unhealthy imports from China is not very high. European powers need access to the Chinese market. They are not willing to allow for the limitation of Chinese imports to EU because they will be harmed in their access to Chinese market.