445
edits
Talk:Shopping centres: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
Jana Dlouha (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 118: | Line 118: | ||
--[[User:Admin|Jiří Dlouhý]] 09:26, 8 March 2011 (CET) | --[[User:Admin|Jiří Dlouhý]] 09:26, 8 March 2011 (CET) | ||
Hi Zuzana, | |||
you have done a lot of work, and I value your effort very high. My remarks are only for future, so that you improve in writing: | |||
*you have not focused on the issue sufficiently – that would spare your effort. If you have spoken e.g. about development of the infrastructure, you need not mention legislation almost at all. You could say that this development was in past few years based on free market principles, with some regulation (legislation, of course), and some influence of citizens. The result is so and so, and has environmental, social, and also economical consequences. It might have some benefits as well – you should show them. | |||
*if the genre is a case study, you might have more concentrated on a real case, e.g. situation in Prague. You could start with it, or only illustrate some general trends after you have outlined them. | |||
*you are afraid to have strong conclusions. If you are speaking about the overconsumption as part of your conclusions, it is not good – we could do little about that. You “play back” the responsibility on the citizens who actually protest. And they are corrupted by low prices as well. | |||
*Your research question is not actually research – it could be hardly methodologically captured. Your question is a question for policy makers. You might pose questions like: what are environmental consequences – transport, soil degradation, landscape factors etc.? What is cost/benefit ratio (in terms of social etc. benefits)? What are driving forces of non-regulated development and could they be abandoned? | |||
*Finally, be careful about the copyright of your images! | |||
Best regards | |||
jana | |||
March, 3rd, 2011 | |||