994
edits
New Zealand: Mining in Schedule 4 Conflict: Difference between revisions
New Zealand: Mining in Schedule 4 Conflict (view source)
Revision as of 14:58, 9 March 2011
, 14:58, 9 March 2011→Questions and proposed methods for further research
Jana Dlouha (talk | contribs) (Research on Potential research questions done - communication process in NZ investigated. Added: resolution steps, communication description, result and lessons learned. New research questions found.) |
|||
| Line 98: | Line 98: | ||
==Questions and proposed methods for further research== | ==Questions and proposed methods for further research== | ||
* | * The communication process could be investigated in more detail: what are the links between the most important factors of economic development ("economic development" could not be considered ''mining'' itself, but rather ''technological progress'' in the mining industry, the process of collation and utilisation of geological data, and the interlinking of the mining industry with other sectors, e.g. recreation), and the number, diversity, and value orientation of the responses in the [http://www.med.govt.nz/upload/73974/Summary%20of%20Schedule%204%20submissions%20July%202010.pdf Summary of Submissions]? | ||
* What are | * What are the subjective values of the environment? How could they be used as a counter-weight to the economic values? | ||
* Institutional procedures and official decision-making processes (going on in the ministries and other institutions concerned) versus democratic process ( | * Institutional procedures and official decision-making processes (going on in the ministries and other institutions concerned) versus the democratic process (on the part of civic society) - what were the differences? Were there any correlations? | ||
* Etc. - many others. | * Etc. - many others. | ||