Talk:Solar Energy: Difference between revisions

767 bytes added ,  10:18, 16 January 2010
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
=== Reviewer´s assessment: ===
Dear Henning, your review is very good and concrete, it is focused on the content and its practical aspects and conclusions which is fine and also appears to be the main problem with the reviewed text (formally there are only little deficiencies). On the other hand, the author always has to develop his own standpoint which is somehow “biased” and defend it against others! Of course his arguments need to be as well informed and comprehensive as possible. Lina´s view is fine: developed countries have to bear the cost of development, not only derive benefits from it – and they are rational enough to “shape” this development so that it has positive impact.
 
--[[User:Jana Dlouha|Jana Dlouha]] 09:18, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
=== Reviewer´s assessment - Henning Strate ===


== 1. Basic criteria ==
== 1. Basic criteria ==
Line 60: Line 63:
--[[User:Henning Strate|Henning Strate]] 11:08, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
--[[User:Henning Strate|Henning Strate]] 11:08, 10 January 2010 (UTC)


== Assessment from January 4th ==
== Assessment from January 4th - Jana Dlouhá==
Remarks:
Remarks:


445

edits