445
edits
Talk:The New Economic Market: Water: Difference between revisions
Talk:The New Economic Market: Water (view source)
Revision as of 15:32, 15 January 2010
, 15:32, 15 January 2010no edit summary
Jana Dlouha (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Jana Dlouha (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Dear Stefan, this is an excellent review and you have gone deeply in the theme you are analyzing. You also have a clear idea how the article should be written to provide not only good background information, but also develop a reasonable conclusion based on it – which should be either focused on a specific practical solution and respect the context of national and international policies in the field, economical principles etc. Well done! | |||
--[[User:Jana Dlouha|Jana Dlouha]] 14:32, 15 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
== Review by Stefan Marx == | |||
1. Basic criteria | 1. Basic criteria | ||
1.1. Relevance of the subject to the general theme (High) | 1.1. Relevance of the subject to the general theme (High) | ||
| Line 45: | Line 51: | ||
All things considered your article contains certain spelling mistakes. In some cases you wrote ‘as’ instead of ‘is’ and ‘per example’ instead of ‘for example / e.g.’ to mention the most important ones. Your abstract is very long but the conclusion is quite short. Perhaps you got it the other way round. To get to the claimed amount of words you should explain your thoughts more detailed and extend your conclusion. I hope my remarks are helping you to improve your text. | All things considered your article contains certain spelling mistakes. In some cases you wrote ‘as’ instead of ‘is’ and ‘per example’ instead of ‘for example / e.g.’ to mention the most important ones. Your abstract is very long but the conclusion is quite short. Perhaps you got it the other way round. To get to the claimed amount of words you should explain your thoughts more detailed and extend your conclusion. I hope my remarks are helping you to improve your text. | ||
Best regards | Best regards Stefan | ||
Stefan | |||
4. General Recommendation for articles (highlight one option): | 4. General Recommendation for articles (highlight one option): | ||
| Line 82: | Line 85: | ||
== Assessment from December 8th == | == Assessment from December 8th == | ||
Your text is good, even if I doubt about the content to a certain extent (quality of drinking water should be good for everyone, not only for rich?). You might mention some risks of water privatization and maybe list benefits more transparently. | Your text is good, even if I doubt about the content to a certain extent (quality of drinking water should be good for everyone, not only for rich?). You might mention some risks of water privatization and maybe list benefits more transparently. | ||