35
edits
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Hi team, | Hi team, | ||
I just want to make a remark to your assumption that CZ will always need nuclear energy to be energetically sel-sufficient. There are two respected studies, which calculate that it is not neccesary - several years old '''Chytra energie''' at www.chytraenergie.info/index.php/chytra-energie/publikace and newer '''Energetická revoluce''' at http://www.greenpeace.org/czech/cz/Multimedia1/Publikace/Energeticka-revoluce-pro-CR/ | I just want to make a remark to your assumption that CZ will always need nuclear energy to be energetically sel-sufficient. There are two respected studies, which calculate that it is not neccesary - several years old '''Chytra energie''' at http://www.chytraenergie.info/index.php/chytra-energie/publikace and newer '''Energetická revoluce''' at http://www.greenpeace.org/czech/cz/Multimedia1/Publikace/Energeticka-revoluce-pro-CR/ | ||
They both count with our big potential of energy savings, which is crutial in energetic debate. | They both count with our big potential of energy savings, which is crutial in energetic debate. |
edits