Students:Rubric for evaluation of the discussion

Criteria/levels of fulfillment	10	5	0	Assessment
Content, clarity & focus	ideas show knowledge; (some) arguments are reliable; ideas clear, focused on aspecific thought or topic; originality & individual standpoint presented	ideas and information sometimes biased; ideas are not very clear or specifically focused; +- originality;+- individual standpoint	no clear points or information, and ideas or opinions controversial from an ethical point of view; ideas disconnected, numerous topics with no clear conclusion; no originality, no individual standpoint
Context	response to others, fits in with the context and main theme of the discussion	+- focused on the main aim of the discussion, +- response to others	a declaration only with no relationship to the theme or other contributions
Commitment	demonstrates values behind the discussion; length & time spent on writing	demonstrates values but which are only half-formed; writing is relatively brief and shows signs of being spontaneous and somewhat lacking in thought and analysis	values behind the discussion not clear; time or attention paid to the writing insufficient
Action oriented	positive approach & practical focus	positive but half-hearted or undeveloped approach; good intent is shown but remains unfocused	not practical outcome, only “chatting”
Constructive approach	conclusions based on individual standpoint & derived from the opinion of the others	Conclusions reveal an individual standpoint but need to bedeveloped further; the opinion of others is either given too much or too little prominence	zero personal conclusions from the discussion and/or zero ability to adjust own opinion to the views of the others
Total (points)				max 50