VCSEwiki:Quality criteria
Review process
For quality criteria, you can enter the Review process of some academic journals:
- Analysis of evaluation reports of scientific papers: what referees say
- See also List of academic journals - select one and find out the rules!
- For the process of reviewing itself, see Peer Review in Wikipedia
Example of Review Form
JOURNAL OF TEACHER EDUCATION FOR SUSTAINABILITY
Paper title:
"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
1. General Recommendation (check one):
1.1. Publish as is ___
1.2. Acceptable with minor modifications _
1.3. Might be accepted after major modifications ___
1.4. Unacceptable (check all that apply) ___
1.4.1. Not appropriate for the theme of the Conference ___
1.4.2. Technically deficient ___
1.4.3. Quality of presentation is poor ___
"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
2. Summary Comments for Author(s)
Please enter the appropriate word from the choices in parentheses
2.1. Interest of the subjects to the themes of the Conference (High/Medium/Low) ......................
2.2. Originality of the paper (High/Medium/Low) ......................
2.3. Adequate references to prior and related works by other authors (High/Medium/Low) ......................
2.4. Accurate information (Yes/No) .........................
2.5. Current information (Yes/No) .......................
2.6. Methodology (Yes/No) ...........................
2.7. Writing style is generally (Excellent/Readable/Poor) ....................
2.7.1. Paper is logically organised (Yes/No) ....................
2.7.2. Ideas are clearly presented (Yes/No) ....................
2.8. Meets submission requirements (abstract, length, style) (Yes/No) …..........
"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
3. Written Comments for Author(s)