World Environment Organization: Difference between revisions

World Environment Organization (view source)

Revision as of 16:29, 22 January 2010

2 bytes removed , 16:29, 22 January 2010

→‎Specialized-Agency-Approach

Jule

121

edits

@@ Line 46: / Line 46: @@
 The aim of the last approach is to get an entity for environmental. A variety of models have been proposed for such an organization, ranging from a hierarchical and centralized body with considerable power to a more loose form of clustering of MEAs and their secretariat. Discussions are about rule making, stand-setting and enforcement; its relationship with existing MEAs: whether it should be part of the UN or excluded of it; whether it would advantage or disadvantage the interest of developing countries. But all models do have some advantages in common: The financial system and the personal situation would be reformed anyway but mainly it would provide a counterweight to the power of the WTO and what is seen to be the increasing dominance of trade principals over environmental protection (cf. Elliott, 2004, p. 104).
-Different models were developed: For example the hierarchical world environmental organization was developed by the WBGU .<ref> The model can be found under [http://www.wbgu.de/wbgu_jg2000_engl.html ''WBGU-model'']</ref>. Another scientific model was developed by Simonis and Biermann: The World Environment and Development Organization as a new specialized agency of the United Nations. The World Environment and Development Organization would integrate UNEP, the CSD and the relevant convention secretariats. As well it includes a high participation of non governmental organizations. Moreover to achieve the greatest possible acceptance the decision making process would be as a North-South parity process (Biermann & Simonis, 1998, p.3).<ref> More detailed information about this model can be found in the literature by Biermann & Simonis listed in the following </ref>
+Different models were developed: For example the hierarchical world environmental organization was developed by the WBGU<ref> The model can be found under [http://www.wbgu.de/wbgu_jg2000_engl.html ''WBGU-model'']</ref>. Another scientific model was developed by Simonis and Biermann: The World Environment and Development Organization as a new specialized agency of the United Nations. The World Environment and Development Organization would integrate UNEP, the CSD and the relevant convention secretariats. As well it includes a high participation of non governmental organizations. Moreover to achieve the greatest possible acceptance the decision making process would be as a North-South parity process (Biermann & Simonis, 1998, p.3).<ref> More detailed information about this model can be found in the literature by Biermann & Simonis listed in the following </ref>
 But both models did not have a high impact on the real reform-process.
 However there is one model in reality in accordance with the specialized-agency-approach: The UNEO-Initiative. It was formed in 2005 by Jacques Ciraque as an international working group. The idea of an UNEO bases on the former reform process of strengthening UNEP: All of the ideas are integrated in this initiative. But the aim is the forming of an own environmental entity. Compared to the WBGU-Concept this idea is not a hierarchical one: The UNEO would be an umbrella organization- for all the other initiatives but without disbanding them. It has been argued that a UNEO should help to systematically pool the scientific knowledge on environmental issues and help to define global environmental strategic guidelines to promote coordination and synergies. But mainly a UNEO would have a greater prominence and a greater political clout than UNEP (cf. Meyer-Ohlendorf & Knigge, 2007, p. 137).