121
edits
World Environment Organization: Difference between revisions
World Environment Organization (view source)
Revision as of 16:27, 22 January 2010
, 16:27, 22 January 2010→Critics
| Line 57: | Line 57: | ||
*The complexity of the current environmental policy is an appropriated answer to the complexity of the problems- a centralization could endanger their solution even more. | *The complexity of the current environmental policy is an appropriated answer to the complexity of the problems- a centralization could endanger their solution even more. | ||
*A huge institution needs a huge organizational apparatus; therefore important human resources and financial resources would be needed for this and cannot be used for facing concrete environmental challenges. | *A huge institution needs a huge organizational apparatus; therefore important human resources and financial resources would be needed for this and cannot be used for facing concrete environmental challenges. | ||
*Facing the national sovereignty “at the end of the day… [a WEO can] do no more than its member states allow it to do ore give the resources to do” and “[…] if governments wanted to make UNEP stronger now, they could do so” (Elliot, 2004, p. 110). This idea raises the important questions about whether a world environment organization would fare any better | *Facing the national sovereignty “at the end of the day… [a WEO can] do no more than its member states allow it to do ore give the resources to do” and “[…] if governments wanted to make UNEP stronger now, they could do so” (Elliot, 2004, p. 110). This idea raises the important questions about whether a world environment organization would fare any better. | ||
=Conclusion: Current Debate and Outlook= | =Conclusion: Current Debate and Outlook= | ||