352
edits
VCSE Guidebook/How to promote the VCSE-model/The VCSE-model for virtual mobility: Difference between revisions
VCSE Guidebook/How to promote the VCSE-model/The VCSE-model for virtual mobility (view source)
Revision as of 06:51, 5 June 2009
, 06:51, 5 June 2009→5.1. The VCSE-model for virtual mobility
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
* effective competence development for<br />international, multi-disciplinary team work | * effective competence development for<br />international, multi-disciplinary team work | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |||
| '''Enhanced quality of study programmes''' | | '''Enhanced quality of study programmes''' | ||
* more courses on offer at home university | * more courses on offer at home university | ||
| Line 39: | Line 40: | ||
* minimal formalities | * minimal formalities | ||
|} | |} | ||
Despite the benefits associated with an international virtual campus, there are still many challenges on the road to implementing and sustaining virtual campuses of European universities at a large scale. A large number of educational, organizational and technological issues need to be tackled (see '''Table 1''', Chapter 2), and given the many differences between universities across Europe, it is not easy to find joint solutions. Another major barrier is the wide-spread conviction, often rooted in ignorance, among educational staff and students of conventional universities that e-learning is unattractive and less effective as compared to face-to-face learning environments. | Despite the benefits associated with an international virtual campus, there are still many challenges on the road to implementing and sustaining virtual campuses of European universities at a large scale. A large number of educational, organizational and technological issues need to be tackled (see '''Table 1''', Chapter 2), and given the many differences between universities across Europe, it is not easy to find joint solutions. Another major barrier is the wide-spread conviction, often rooted in ignorance, among educational staff and students of conventional universities that e-learning is unattractive and less effective as compared to face-to-face learning environments. | ||