52
edits
Talk:Solar Energy: Difference between revisions
→ISPoS program - Quality rating - Jan Jelínek
Jana Dlouha (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=== Reviewer´s assessment | Dear Henning, your review is very good and concrete, it is focused on the content and its practical aspects and conclusions which is fine and also appears to be the main problem with the reviewed text (formally there are only little deficiencies). On the other hand, the author always has to develop his own standpoint which is somehow “biased” and defend it against others! Of course his arguments need to be as well informed and comprehensive as possible. Lina´s view is fine: developed countries have to bear the cost of development, not only derive benefits from it – and they are rational enough to “shape” this development so that it has positive impact. | ||
--[[User:Jana Dlouha|Jana Dlouha]] 09:18, 16 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
=== Reviewer´s assessment - Henning Strate === | |||
== 1. Basic criteria == | == 1. Basic criteria == | ||
| Line 60: | Line 63: | ||
--[[User:Henning Strate|Henning Strate]] 11:08, 10 January 2010 (UTC) | --[[User:Henning Strate|Henning Strate]] 11:08, 10 January 2010 (UTC) | ||
== Assessment from January 4th == | == Assessment from January 4th - Jana Dlouhá== | ||
Remarks: | Remarks: | ||
| Line 73: | Line 76: | ||
--[[User:Jana Dlouha|Jana Dlouha]] 12:41, 8 December 2009 (UTC) | --[[User:Jana Dlouha|Jana Dlouha]] 12:41, 8 December 2009 (UTC) | ||
== ISPoS program - Quality rating - Jan Jelínek == | |||
Dear Lina, | |||
I've read your essay on Solar Energy and I would like to vote on its quality. We write these ratings of quality as a part of Interdisciplinary Study Program on Sustainability and Globalisation. | |||
I was attracted by questions your work deals with and by its elaboration. Your essay is largely well-arranged which helps with orientation in different part of the text. Introduction is relatively long and should be more structured. You often pass between disparate things, which makes it difficult to follow your viewpoint hidden in the background. Part "Advantages and Disadvantages" is very well written and description of requisite and importance of solar energy is well-turned. | |||
Despite the occasional lack of additional information, work and own research behind the essay is explicit. Your work processing is unconventional, but overall rightly complements your essay focused on solar energy as part of sustainable energy. | |||
Best regards, | |||
Jan | |||