Talk:Shopping centres: Difference between revisions

2,799 bytes added ,  07:09, 15 March 2011
→‎Gallery: new section
(→‎Gallery: new section)
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== Literature review  ==
__NOTOC__
 
=== Final assessment===
Well done literature review: includes meta-reflection that could be used in further stqages of your research procedure.
For the moment about 90 point as some formal requirements are still abandoned (see ''General Recommendation for articles'' and ''Comments on the almost final version of the text''. Good luck with finishing the text!
 
I suggest that you concentrate in next step on description of the phenomenon using information from your resources. Then, you could write in a foreword (or amend your already written foreword) that this problem has many reasons: specify them as psychological, behavioral, economical etc. In conclusion you could say something about its negative effects.
 
You still need to decide what you consider to be the main lesson learned from your case study. Something that you could share with the rest of the world pointing out that specific conditions described (CR situation) provide some valuable experience for the others. Economic and other reasons are global, but concrete manifestations have to do something with our conditions.
 
--[[User:Jana Dlouha|Jana Dlouha]] 18:48, 22 January 2011 (CET)


== Peer review of the case study (by Caroline Reibe)  ==
== Peer review of the case study (by Caroline Reibe)  ==
Line 117: Line 111:
Nice day
Nice day


--[[User:Admin|Admin]] 09:26, 8 March 2011 (CET)
--[[User:Admin|Jiří Dlouhý]] 09:26, 8 March 2011 (CET)
 
== Comments on the almost final version of the text ==
 
Hi Zuzana,
 
you have done a lot of work, and I value your effort very high. My remarks are only for future, so that you improve in writing:
*you have not focused on the issue sufficiently – that would spare your effort. If you have spoken e.g. about development of the infrastructure, you need not mention legislation almost at all. You could say that this development was in past few years based on free market principles, with some regulation (legislation, of course), and some influence of citizens. The result is so and so, and has environmental, social, and also economical consequences. It might have some benefits as well – you should show them.
*if the genre is a case study, you might have more concentrated on a real case, e.g. situation in Prague. You could start with it, or only illustrate some general trends after you have outlined them.
*you are afraid to have strong conclusions. If you are speaking about the overconsumption as part of your conclusions, it is not good – we could do little about that. You “play back” the responsibility on the citizens who actually protest. And they are corrupted by low prices as well.
*Your research question is not actually research – it could be hardly methodologically captured. Your question is a question for policy makers. You might pose questions like: what are environmental consequences – transport, soil degradation, landscape factors etc.? What is cost/benefit ratio (in terms of social etc. benefits)? What are driving forces of non-regulated development and could they be abandoned?
*Finally, be careful about the copyright of your images!
 
Best regards
 
jana
 
March, 3rd, 2011
 
== Literature review  ==
 
Well done literature review: includes meta-reflection that could be used in further stqages of your research procedure.
 
I suggest that you concentrate in next step on description of the phenomenon using information from your resources. Then, you could write in a foreword (or amend your already written foreword) that this problem has many reasons: specify them as psychological, behavioral, economical etc. In conclusion you could say something about its negative effects.
 
You still need to decide what you consider to be the main lesson learned from your case study. Something that you could share with the rest of the world pointing out that specific conditions described (CR situation) provide some valuable experience for the others. Economic and other reasons are global, but concrete manifestations have to do something with our conditions.
 
--[[User:Jana Dlouha|Jana Dlouha]] 18:48, 22 January 2011 (CET)
 
== Gallery ==
 
Hi Zuzana,
there is possibility in wiki of quite easy presentation of images - this is function <nowiki><galllery></nowiki> (you have to use "Edit" function for this comment page to see, how I did it):
 
<gallery>
Image:240px-AON WAKAMATSU SHOPPING CENTER.jpg |Shopping centre Wakamatsu. Fukuoka, Japan
Image:240px-Galerie Butovice.jpg |Galerie Butovice, Prague, Czech Republic
Image:240px-Praha-letnany.jpg | Shopping centre Letňany, Prague, Czech Republic
Image:240px-Praha Chodov Centrum Chodov a okoli.jpg| Centrum Chodov, Prague, Czech Republic
</gallery>
 
But I do not want to change your article directly, as you maybe have different opinion how the pictures should be used.
 
I had made some minor changes in references and in formating of your page.--[[User:Admin|Admin]] 06:09, 15 March 2011 (CET)