Talk:Shopping centres: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
4,671 bytes added ,  07:09, 15 March 2011
→‎Gallery: new section
No edit summary
(→‎Gallery: new section)
 
(6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== Literature review  ==
__NOTOC__
 
=== Final assessment===
Well done literature review: includes meta-reflection that could be used in further stqages of your research procedure.
For the moment about 90 point as some formal requirements are still abandoned (see ''General Recommendation for articles'' and ''Comments on the almost final version of the text''. Good luck with finishing the text!
 
I suggest that you concentrate in next step on description of the phenomenon using information from your resources. Then, you could write in a foreword (or amend your already written foreword) that this problem has many reasons: specify them as psychological, behavioral, economical etc. In conclusion you could say something about its negative effects.
 
You still need to decide what you consider to be the main lesson learned from your case study. Something that you could share with the rest of the world pointing out that specific conditions described (CR situation) provide some valuable experience for the others. Economic and other reasons are global, but concrete manifestations have to do something with our conditions.
 
--[[User:Jana Dlouha|Jana Dlouha]] 18:48, 22 January 2011 (CET)


== Peer review of the case study (by Caroline Reibe)  ==
== Peer review of the case study (by Caroline Reibe)  ==
Line 95: Line 89:


--[[User:Reibe|Reibe]] 21:08, 6 March 2011 (CET)<br>
--[[User:Reibe|Reibe]] 21:08, 6 March 2011 (CET)<br>
== Possible copyright violation problem ==
Dear Zuzka,
I am afraid there could be problems with violation of copyright law on your page. In principle, picture is an author work and if you use picture in your article, even with correct description of its origin is similar as you use whole article from some journal in your work - not as if you cite only small part.
Maybe you have permission of the authors of the pictures to use them - if not, I would reccomend you to use other pictures. As VCSEwiki is licenced by Creative Commons BY-SA licence, you can use without problems any picture from Wikipedia Commons: http://commons.wikimedia.org - there are more than 9 millions of them there. BTW. VCSEwiki is interconnected with Commons - so you can include picture from Commons very easy - it is enough to write in your text <nowiki>[[file:name_of_image_in_commons.jpg]]</nowiki> and image will be there.
For example:
[[File:Galerie Butovice.jpg|250 px|NC Galerie Butovice]]
''BTW: There is some technical problem in VCSEwiki at this moment when you use image from Commons with name which uses diacritics and you want to make smaller immage. Eg. <nowiki>[[File:Praha Centrum Černý Most.jpg|thumb]]</nowiki> does not work. Sorry for that. If you want to use such image, you have to download it and upload it to VCSEwiki.''
I am not sure, but probably also some images from Flickr are under Creative Commons license and can be used, but I am not sure if all of them are.
For the table - I know that tables in wiki are relatively complicated, so I had created table for you from your image.
For the two graphs - the easy (relatively) solution is to use data from your source, but to create your own graph - than you cite only necessary part = data from original source and it is according to author law.
Nice day
--[[User:Admin|Jiří Dlouhý]] 09:26, 8 March 2011 (CET)
== Comments on the almost final version of the text ==
Hi Zuzana,
you have done a lot of work, and I value your effort very high. My remarks are only for future, so that you improve in writing:
*you have not focused on the issue sufficiently – that would spare your effort. If you have spoken e.g. about development of the infrastructure, you need not mention legislation almost at all. You could say that this development was in past few years based on free market principles, with some regulation (legislation, of course), and some influence of citizens. The result is so and so, and has environmental, social, and also economical consequences. It might have some benefits as well – you should show them.
*if the genre is a case study, you might have more concentrated on a real case, e.g. situation in Prague. You could start with it, or only illustrate some general trends after you have outlined them.
*you are afraid to have strong conclusions. If you are speaking about the overconsumption as part of your conclusions, it is not good – we could do little about that. You “play back” the responsibility on the citizens who actually protest. And they are corrupted by low prices as well.
*Your research question is not actually research – it could be hardly methodologically captured. Your question is a question for policy makers. You might pose questions like: what are environmental consequences – transport, soil degradation, landscape factors etc.? What is cost/benefit ratio (in terms of social etc. benefits)? What are driving forces of non-regulated development and could they be abandoned?
*Finally, be careful about the copyright of your images!
Best regards
jana
March, 3rd, 2011
== Literature review  ==
Well done literature review: includes meta-reflection that could be used in further stqages of your research procedure.
I suggest that you concentrate in next step on description of the phenomenon using information from your resources. Then, you could write in a foreword (or amend your already written foreword) that this problem has many reasons: specify them as psychological, behavioral, economical etc. In conclusion you could say something about its negative effects.
You still need to decide what you consider to be the main lesson learned from your case study. Something that you could share with the rest of the world pointing out that specific conditions described (CR situation) provide some valuable experience for the others. Economic and other reasons are global, but concrete manifestations have to do something with our conditions.
--[[User:Jana Dlouha|Jana Dlouha]] 18:48, 22 January 2011 (CET)
== Gallery ==
Hi Zuzana,
there is possibility in wiki of quite easy presentation of images - this is function <nowiki><galllery></nowiki> (you have to use "Edit" function for this comment page to see, how I did it):
<gallery>
Image:240px-AON WAKAMATSU SHOPPING CENTER.jpg |Shopping centre Wakamatsu. Fukuoka, Japan
Image:240px-Galerie Butovice.jpg |Galerie Butovice, Prague, Czech Republic
Image:240px-Praha-letnany.jpg | Shopping centre Letňany, Prague, Czech Republic
Image:240px-Praha Chodov Centrum Chodov a okoli.jpg| Centrum Chodov, Prague, Czech Republic
</gallery>
But I do not want to change your article directly, as you maybe have different opinion how the pictures should be used.
I had made some minor changes in references and in formating of your page.--[[User:Admin|Admin]] 06:09, 15 March 2011 (CET)

Navigation menu