Talk:Integration and tolerance: Difference between revisions

From VCSEwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with '== 1. Basic criteria == 1.1. Relevance of the subject to the general theme (High/Medium/Low) High 1.2. Coherence of the content with the title and thesis (High/Medium/Low) Hig…')
 
Line 39: Line 39:
4.1. Publish as is
4.1. Publish as is


4.2. Acceptable with minor modifications
'''4.2. Acceptable with minor modifications'''


4.3. Might be accepted after major modifications
4.3. Might be accepted after major modifications

Revision as of 11:20, 7 January 2010

1. Basic criteria

1.1. Relevance of the subject to the general theme (High/Medium/Low) High

1.2. Coherence of the content with the title and thesis (High/Medium/Low) High

1.3. Quality of the content from the methodological point of view (High/Medium/Low) High

1.4. Quality of the text from the formal point of view (see below) (High/Medium/Low) Medium

2. Summary Comments for Author(s)

2.1. Contribution to theory or practice (High/Medium/Low) High

2.2. Originality of the paper (High/Medium/Low) Medium

2.3. Adequate references to prior and related works by other authors (High/Medium/Low) High

2.4. Accurate information (Yes/No) Yes

2.5. Current information (Yes/No) Yes

2.6. Methodology (Yes/No)

2.7. Writing style is generally (Excellent/Readable/Poor) Readable

2.7.1. Paper is logically organised (Yes/No) No

2.7.2. Ideas are clearly presented (Yes/No) Yes

2.8. Meets submission requirements (abstract, length, style, citation rules) (Yes/No) Yes


3. Written Comments for Author(s)

4. General Recommendation for articles (highlight one option):

4.1. Publish as is

4.2. Acceptable with minor modifications

4.3. Might be accepted after major modifications

4.4. Unacceptable (select following option):

4.4.1. Not appropriate for the content/theme of the Course

4.4.2. Technically deficient

4.4.3. Quality of presentation is poor