Talk:“The Low Price” of the textile discounter KiK – consequences for labour conditions in textile factories in Bangladesh: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
(Created page with "== Literature review == Again, well done. Your review contains a lot of meta-reflection of the resourses - not only the information on content but also on the usefulness and lim...")
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
== First draft of the case study ==
The theme is already highly developed, lot of arguments have been brought to support the thesis that the labour work in developing countries might be protected only formally by Codes of Conduct that are not respected in reality. This is the core of case study, and could be explained how it could happen (missing regulations on international level?)
I think that the text needs not to be rewritten completely, just please make it more clear to non-experts (e.g. provide some link to KiK - I did not know what kind of company it is). Highlight the core principle - violation of labor rights - and its context, conditions under which this could happen. This is the main idea and contribution of your case, and focus your logic and argumentation towards strong conclusion in this respect. Your potential research questions leave for further stages and real researchers, just offer some solution (which could be explored further on).
Actually, you might be ready with your writing quite soon, and wish you good luck! Formally, use please multiple reference like this: <ref name=KIK>Who pays for our clothing from Lidl and KIK? Published at Kampagne für Saubere-Kleidung (Clean Clothes Campaign; CCC). Published as brochure at January 1st, 2008: http://www.saubere-kleidung.de/downloads/publikationen/2008-01_Brosch-Lidl-KiK_en.pdf (p. 28).</ref> (look in the editing mode)<ref name=KIK></ref>.
== References ==
<references/>
--[[User:Jana Dlouha|Jana Dlouha]] 11:49, 25 January 2011 (CET)
== Literature review ==
== Literature review ==


445

edits