Students:Rubric for evaluation of the discussion

From VCSEwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.
Criteria/levels of fulfillment 10 5 0 Assessment
Content, clarity & focus ideas show knowledge; (some) arguments are reliable; ideas clear, focused on aspecific thought or topic; originality & individual standpoint presented ideas and information sometimes biased; ideas are not very clear or specifically focused; +- originality;+- individual standpoint no clear points or information, and ideas or opinions controversial from an ethical point of view; ideas disconnected, numerous topics with no clear conclusion; no originality, no individual standpoint
Context response to others, fits in with the context and main theme of the discussion +- focused on the main aim of the discussion, +- response to others a declaration only with no relationship to the theme or other contributions
Commitment demonstrates values behind the discussion; length & time spent on writing demonstrates values but which are only half-formed; writing is relatively brief and shows signs of being spontaneous and somewhat lacking in thought and analysis values behind the discussion not clear; time or attention paid to the writing insufficient
Action oriented positive approach & practical focus positive but half-hearted or undeveloped approach; good intent is shown but remains unfocused not practical outcome, only “chatting”
Constructive approach conclusions based on individual standpoint & derived from the opinion of the others Conclusions reveal an individual standpoint but need to bedeveloped further; the opinion of others is either given too much or too little prominence zero personal conclusions from the discussion and/or zero ability to adjust own opinion to the views of the others
Total (points) max 50