57
edits
Students:Kateřina Racková: Difference between revisions
→Evaluation of the field trip
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 62: | Line 62: | ||
== Evaluation of the field trip == | == Evaluation of the field trip == | ||
'''Lectures''' were all relevant to the issue of sustainability, included balanced topics and led by experts. Balance between university and field lectures was reached though I would rather prefer more field lectures to university ones… | |||
'''Social life and free time''' – the second best aspect of the trip beside enriching sustainability lectures. I appreciate we all had a chance to meet new similarly thinking people with different backgrounds, discuss, work and play together I also value adequate amount of free time when we had a chance to experience Hamburg and Luneburg. | |||
'''Accommodation''' was adequate, in comparison with field trips where I have had a chance to participate rooms and sanitary facilities in Luneburg Sportspark were of higher standard and there was nothing to complain about. | |||
'''Food''' could be recommended as it was delicious and I liked the way how it was served: self-served. Due to the fact we could decide about serving size, there was barely any food left. We ate “green” (multigrain rolls, vegetables and local products) and in a “green” way in accordance with sustainability paradigm. | |||
'''Transport''' by a bus was the only suitable way for trip realisation as we had to move from one place to another almost every day and it would be difficult to do that on time with public transport. On the other hand it was not “green” at all | |||