Israel-Palestine conflict and globalisation: Difference between revisions

From VCSEwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with '3. From your perspective and experience does globalization have the potential to resolve a conflict not related to this phenomenon, for example, the Israel-Palestine conflict, or…')
 
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:


===Answer by Jana Hybášková:===
===Answer by Jana Hybášková:===
From my perspective globalization in its overall result is neutral. Certainly, it has great potential of being positive engine of change. Globalization is kind of a river flow, bringing lot of energy. If the energy is used in sustainable manner, supporting not only foreign trade, industry and financial sector and related parts of societies, but if managed carefully, as inclusive public development, it can bring great benefit. If not, in cases, geographical as well as “social” places are left behind; they fall into marginalization and exclusion.  
From my perspective globalization in its overall result is neutral. Certainly, it has great potential to be a positive engine of change. Globalization is kind of river flow, bringing lots of energy. If the energy is used in a sustainable manner, supporting not only foreign trade, industry and financial sector and related parts of societies, but if managed carefully, as inclusive public development, it can also bring great benefit. If not, in some cases geographical as well as “social” places are left behind; they become marginalized and excluded.  


In Europe, we have a great tool - cohesion funds. NUTS, geographical-statistical areas displaying less than 60 % level of average GDP should prepare development plans, than co financed by EU. Cohesion fund of the strongest economy of the world, which EU is, is a great example of positively managed globalization. Cohesion fund develops infrastructure, sometimes it is understood to help only construction lobby. If managed properly, it solves environmental issues, industrial declines, re populates rural areas, helps ecological fishing, preserves identity, re creates traditional service sector…
In Europe, we have a great tool - cohesion funds. NUTS, geographical-statistical areas with less than 60 % of the average GDP should prepare development plans, then be co-financed by the EU. The cohesion fund of the strongest economy of the world, which the EU is, is a great example of positively managed globalization. Cohesion funds develop infrastructure, although sometimes it is understood as helping only the construction lobby. If managed properly, it solves environmental issues, industrial declines, repopulates rural areas, helps ecological fishing, preserves identity, and recreates traditional service sectors…


Europe distributes important financial aid within the frame of European neighborhood policy – ENP. ENP program in this financial perspective represents annually 600 million Euros for instance for Egypt, similar is allocation for Syria and Palestine. This money can be used for recreating small and media businesses in all mentioned countries, can help co finance micro credit loans, agricultural exports, can be used to recovery of energy grids, water and waste water treatment, and of course classical infrastructure. You might try to go to AIDCO website, to see the type of projects financed be EU in the areas, hit by Arab Israeli conflict.  
Europe distributes important financial aid within the framework of European neighborhood policy – ENP. The ENP program in this financial perspective represents 600 million Euros annually, for instance for Egypt, and there is a similarallocation for Syria and Palestine. This money can be used for recreating small and medium-sized businesses in all these countries, can help co finance micro credit loans, agricultural exports, can be used for the recovery of energy grids, water and waste water treatment, and of course classical infrastructure. You might try to go to the AIDCO website to see the types of projects financed be the EU in the areas hit by Arab-Israeli conflict.  


Current Israeli government tries to minimize public damage of occupation – or reconciliation. The first step was to open for “economic development “of the West bank. If the West Bank is more free of checkpoints, has a better infrastructure, can export its production to EU, can  built small and media companies, repair taxation system, pay for better education, functioning administration and police, the live in West Bank will improve substantially. If the citizens of West Bank can be employed, send their kids to school, repair their houses, achieve basic health care system, live in bit more clean and safe environment, they will definitely decline to support Martyrs, terrorist, Hamas.  
The current Israeli government tries to minimize the public damage of the occupation – or reconciliation. The first step was to begin the “economic development “ of the West bank. If the West Bank is more free of checkpoints, has better infrastructure, can export its production to EU, can  build small and medium-sized companies, repair the taxation system, pay for better education, functioning administration and police, life in the West Bank will improve substantially. If the citizens of the West Bank can be employed, send their kids to school, repair their houses, achieve a basic health care system, live in a cleaner and safer environment, they will definitely refuse to support Martyrs, terrorists and Hamas.  


Precondition is clear: The world, Israelis and Palestinian they should allow for West Bank to be opened to globalization, and to be totally left behind, as it happens now. How to achieve it? The issue very much is time planning. We can not call first for substantial increase of security, and than allow for economic development. The process should be parallel – gradual opening, gradual increase of opportunity, gradual plug in to globalization, gradual decrease of security threat. If managed properly, globalization can bring potential energy. The higher the security risk, the higher the security measures, the lower the chance to globalization refreshment. The wise decisions of EU are together with the US support the functioning security sector: the police, state prosecution, and prison and detention system. If Palestinians are able to control their own security threats, it will be much easier to pressure Israel to decrease security measures. If this happens, West Bank can be more open to globalization chance.   
The precondition is clear: the world, Israelis and Palestinians should allow for the West Bank to be opened to globalization, and not to be totally left behind, as is happening now. How to achieve it? The issue very much is about time planning. We can not call first for a substantial increase in security and then allow for economic development. The process should be parallel – a gradual opening, a gradual increase of opportunity, a gradual connection to globalization, a gradual decrease of the security threat. If managed properly, globalization can bring potential energy. The higher the security risk, the higher the security measures, the lower the chance for globalization renewal. The wise decisions of the EU are, together with US support, a functioning security sector: the police, state prosecution, and prison and detention system. If Palestinians are able to control their own security threats, it will be much easier to pressure Israel to decrease security measures. If this happens, the West Bank can be more open to globalization opportunities.   


Short negative scenario: If Syria decides seriously for the peace with Israel, and signs unilateral peace treaty with it, then the world donor, financial and trade support will go in this direction. Syria will earn enormous potential sharing water resources and land with Israel. It will gain big market, enormous investment. If “dreamy” scenario goes well, Israel can develop Syrian oil and gas sector. West Bank will stay occupied, backyard territory, left out of any economic opportunity. Hundreds years old disputes between Palestinians and Syrians will be resolved.
A short negative scenario: if Syria seriously sues for peace with Israel and signs a unilateral peace treaty with it, then the world donors, and financial and trade support will go in this direction. Syria will earn enormous potential sharing water resources and land with Israel. It will gain a big market and enormous investment. If such a “dream” scenario goes well, Israel can develop the Syrian oil and gas sector. The West Bank would stay occupied, a backyard territory, and left out of any economic opportunity. Hundreds of years of old disputes between Palestinians and Syrians will be resolved.

Revision as of 12:57, 4 December 2009

3. From your perspective and experience does globalization have the potential to resolve a conflict not related to this phenomenon, for example, the Israel-Palestine conflict, or to possibly make it worse?

Answer by Jana Hybášková:

From my perspective globalization in its overall result is neutral. Certainly, it has great potential to be a positive engine of change. Globalization is kind of river flow, bringing lots of energy. If the energy is used in a sustainable manner, supporting not only foreign trade, industry and financial sector and related parts of societies, but if managed carefully, as inclusive public development, it can also bring great benefit. If not, in some cases geographical as well as “social” places are left behind; they become marginalized and excluded.

In Europe, we have a great tool - cohesion funds. NUTS, geographical-statistical areas with less than 60 % of the average GDP should prepare development plans, then be co-financed by the EU. The cohesion fund of the strongest economy of the world, which the EU is, is a great example of positively managed globalization. Cohesion funds develop infrastructure, although sometimes it is understood as helping only the construction lobby. If managed properly, it solves environmental issues, industrial declines, repopulates rural areas, helps ecological fishing, preserves identity, and recreates traditional service sectors…

Europe distributes important financial aid within the framework of European neighborhood policy – ENP. The ENP program in this financial perspective represents 600 million Euros annually, for instance for Egypt, and there is a similarallocation for Syria and Palestine. This money can be used for recreating small and medium-sized businesses in all these countries, can help co finance micro credit loans, agricultural exports, can be used for the recovery of energy grids, water and waste water treatment, and of course classical infrastructure. You might try to go to the AIDCO website to see the types of projects financed be the EU in the areas hit by Arab-Israeli conflict.

The current Israeli government tries to minimize the public damage of the occupation – or reconciliation. The first step was to begin the “economic development “ of the West bank. If the West Bank is more free of checkpoints, has better infrastructure, can export its production to EU, can build small and medium-sized companies, repair the taxation system, pay for better education, functioning administration and police, life in the West Bank will improve substantially. If the citizens of the West Bank can be employed, send their kids to school, repair their houses, achieve a basic health care system, live in a cleaner and safer environment, they will definitely refuse to support Martyrs, terrorists and Hamas.

The precondition is clear: the world, Israelis and Palestinians should allow for the West Bank to be opened to globalization, and not to be totally left behind, as is happening now. How to achieve it? The issue very much is about time planning. We can not call first for a substantial increase in security and then allow for economic development. The process should be parallel – a gradual opening, a gradual increase of opportunity, a gradual connection to globalization, a gradual decrease of the security threat. If managed properly, globalization can bring potential energy. The higher the security risk, the higher the security measures, the lower the chance for globalization renewal. The wise decisions of the EU are, together with US support, a functioning security sector: the police, state prosecution, and prison and detention system. If Palestinians are able to control their own security threats, it will be much easier to pressure Israel to decrease security measures. If this happens, the West Bank can be more open to globalization opportunities.

A short negative scenario: if Syria seriously sues for peace with Israel and signs a unilateral peace treaty with it, then the world donors, and financial and trade support will go in this direction. Syria will earn enormous potential sharing water resources and land with Israel. It will gain a big market and enormous investment. If such a “dream” scenario goes well, Israel can develop the Syrian oil and gas sector. The West Bank would stay occupied, a backyard territory, and left out of any economic opportunity. Hundreds of years of old disputes between Palestinians and Syrians will be resolved.