Students:Case study methodology

Content and goals

In contrast to the e-learning modules of the ISPoS program, the Summer School concentrated on the local problems of a specific region where the huge impacts of supra-regional industries are visible. The program capitalized on the opportunities to see and experience the situation in the Ore Mountains: a Czech – German border region which suffers from (unregulated) mining industry, air pollution from lignite power plants and chemical factories, and above all bears the history of the Sudetenland with all its attached stigmas relating to the forced migration of its inhabitants. We have met local people and points of interest, explored and described the current situation and tried to find solutions through the exploration of the actor analysis method with a practical application to the local circumstances.

Problem and hypothesis

With regard to the preliminary experience with the region (preparation and realization of the Summer School 2011) we have posed a hypothesis that the source of pressing regional problems that include social, economic and environmental sphere are distorted relationships of those living in the area – dysfunctional social structure that rather provides good ground for exploitation than for living. We have had evidence from the history – expulsion of the German population and invasion of the “gold miners” caused enormous degradation of whole regions. Consequently, after the post-war period there appeared to be no ground for re-establishment of civic structures, and ideologically based regional strategy aimed at development of heavy industry base for whole communist block at any price faced no opposition. The tradition of unscrupulous exploitation is still relevant today as the place lacks points of reference for the development of new, place based relationships within community – history with its artefacts has disappeared in the mining pits and artificially “reconstructed” nature does not provide any emotional incentives that would be a basis for development of a feeling for home. (However, if we look at the region with more attentiveness, its beauty could be easily revealed.)

Research question

Sustainable development regional strategies in general aim to capitalize on regional resources (natural, cultural) and manage them in sustainable way to develop their potential, and simultaneously preserve them for future generations. But in case when economy of the region is fully oriented towards “big projects” based on exploitation of “enormous natural resource abundance”, and regional strategies do not support small scaled innovations and initiatives (which makes from inhabitants hostages), something has to be changed substantially. Obviously, local people should be empowered to get rid of economic dependence on the big companies, but also gain new relationship to the place to feel responsibility for its future. For researchers, this situation provides an opportunity to analyse which actors might be sources of conflict and which create vital bonds or networks with other social groups and also are connected to the regional heritage (history, tradition, natural points etc.). Based on these considerations, we have identified the main research question for this year: How is the social capital formed? Who contributes to it and how? Then we also explored, how might be (or already is) this social capital contributing to sustainable development of the region, what are the main processes, and who plays the role in them.

Related case study

The other aim was to develop a case study focused on relationships of different interest groups (or actors) playing a role in brown coal mining conflict. We have made a basis for that – described the situation “objectively” – we have used resources describing the history, culture, environment etc. Our aim was to let the local actors to contribute to it – from their subjective point of view that included also their interests with regard to the mining issue. This part of our research has still to be done.

Framework for exploration

Analysis of the regional situation and its sustainable development opportunities from the point of view of regional actors, from the perspective of social capital, and in historical and contemporary context.

I. Context: introduction into the regional situation with its history and current problems

II. Framing: guiding concepts in regional context (social capital, relations to place, EU and global driving forces) Introduce the concept of social capital (SC)

1. Definition

• What does it mean in the local context?

2. Define environmental and economic capital & interrelationships

• What do these concepts mean in the local context?
• How do they manifest in the history and now?

Place-based principles in regional context 3. Definition

• Find the role in different cooperation networks, spheres (education,…) and reflect relations to social etc. capital

New networks and relationships (EU, global networks) 4. Definition or description

• Find the role in different cooperation networks, spheres (economy,…) and reflect relations to social etc. capital

III. Identification of boundary objects: case studies of regional situation with future perspective (and hidden role of social capital)

1. Case study writing and important aspects from analytical point of view

IV. Hypothesis: SD concept and regional strategies include three pillars and interrelationships: economic, environmental, and social. role of SC underestimated as this is mainly “process oriented” (consists in relationships between elements of the system, not product oriented etc.). SC has played a role in history and its destruction caused huge environmental and economic problems. SC is one of the driving forces of the development and should be paid attention accordingly. Should be shown in our case.

Method of work: Specification of the research perspective – social capital – within the region (object of the study -> tackled as a system) and its development strategies;

Research question: How is the SC perspective manifested in the research area, is it supported within development strategies? 1. Analysis of existing regional development principles (ZÚR) from SC perspective 2. Analysis of potential regional development strategies from SC perspective based on case studies and SWOT analysis done by actors

V. Analytical methods, we are going to use – methodological introduction

1. Case study writing (input by actors exploited, and how to supplement knowledge base) & analysis (how it works in the research, and what different viewpoints reveal) 2. Interviews – goal: receive objective information on the situation  critically assess info from other actors and reflect role of actor within the context of cooperation, public debate and simply regional situation 3. SWOT – perspectives by different actors 4. Comparative study: comparison of two countries, analysis of influence of different actors than in CR (at least mining companies missing) on regional development options. 5. Actor analysis 6. Mind mapping – stakeholder maps with relations between actors (different graphical expression) 7. Interaction analysis – analysis of relationships and interactions in the mind map 8. System analysis of the social relations (place is one of the elements of the system)

• Structural
• From the viewpoint of relations between elements and processes

9. Reframing workshop: 3 perspectives applied on the case study and mind maps. Relevant projects and scenarios outlined. 10. Scenario analysis – introductory steps

VI. Students’ work – STEPS:

1. Collaborative work I: identify actors in the network, think about system of relations

• experiences from e-learning

Identify important aspects of the network from the point of view of SC (trust etc.) 2. Group work I (GW I) – stakeholder mapping workshop: forming of actor groups, role-playing one of the actors + creation of the „knowledge base“ for the role of actor:

• Draw a map of actors, analyse and identify uncertainties to be explored
• Mental mapping of the situation – relations of the group (one of the actors) to other actors
• Interrelations of other actors

3. Group and Collaborative work II – case study writing:

• How to interview real actors
• Case study writing on behalf of an interest group, with input of the interviews real actors

4. Group work II (GW II) – comparative study of relationships on the German side of the border Actor analysis focused on important aspects from the SC perspective (trust, relation to the place, etc.)

• Actor analysis methodology revisited – SC focus
• Analysis of the mental maps done by other “actors” in GW I
• Start with analysing of the input produced by real actors
• Comparison with German situation

5. Collaborative work III – actor analysis of the stakeholder map produced: Put together results done by “actors”: students’ groups

• Relations between stakeholder maps produced by students in groups, and combining stakeholders maps into one
• Analysis of actors’ relationships, based on concept of ‘vital interests’ (see below)
• Analysis of actors’ relationships, based on concept of ‘superstructure options’ (see below)
• Find common interests and conflicts in scenarios done by different actors (from SWOT analyses)

6. Group work III – reframing workshop: Identification of potential regional projects