Talk:Does the globalization of media lead to homogenization?
The text is very well written, especially the way you cite your sources, the logic etc.
Be careful to raise some important point at the end. You have actually two topics - one is media (which, being globalized, bring more risks than only homogenization - e.g. they stress importance of relatively not important messages while at the same moment "virtualize" real risks like wars and serious accidents - you can watch them while having dinner). The other theme is homogenization which could be caused by other features - market, tourism etc. Try to find real links between your selected topics and you may mention also these other factors.
You might mention cultural specifics of media - or are they neutral? Is not their objectivity one of the reason of homogenization?
--Jana Dlouha 17:10, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
Paper title:
Does the globalization of media lead to homogenization?
""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
Reviewer´s assessment:
1. Basic criteria
1.1. Relevance of the subject to the general theme (High/Medium/Low).......high...............
1.2. Coherence of the content with the title and thesis (High/Medium/Low).........high (but not too).............
1.3. Quality of the content from the methodological point of view (see below) (High/Medium/Low)........medium..............
1.4. Quality of the text from the formal point of view (see below) (High/Medium/Low).........high.............
2. Summary Comments for Author(s)
2.1. Contribution to theory or practice (High/Medium/Low) .....high.................
2.2. Originality of the paper (High/Medium/Low) .......medium...............
2.3. Adequate references to prior and related works by other authors (High/Medium/Low) ........high (but not too)..............
2.4. Accurate information (Yes/No) .........yes................
2.5. Current information (Yes/No) ...........yes............
2.6. Methodology (Yes/No) ............yes...............
2.7. Writing style is generally (Excellent/Readable/Poor) ..........excellent..........
2.7.1. Paper is logically organised (Yes/No) ......yes..............
2.7.2. Ideas are clearly presented (Yes/No) ..........yes..........
2.8. Meets submission requirements (abstract, length, style, citation rules) (Yes/No)...yes......
3. Written Comments for Author(s)
Dear Corinna, It is a pleasure to read your article. It is interesting and also your style of writing makes big sense and because you are really able to lead through
4. General Recommendation for articles (highlight one option):
4.1. Publish as is
4.2. Acceptable with minor modifications
4.3. Might be accepted after major modifications
4.4. Unacceptable (select following option):
4.4.1. Not appropriate for the content/theme of the Course
4.4.2. Technically deficient
4.4.3. Quality of presentation is poor