| Criteria/levels of fulfillment |
10 |
5 |
0 |
Assessment |
|
| Content, clarity & focus |
ideas show knowledge; (some) arguments are reliable; ideas clear, focused on aspecific thought or topic; originality & individual standpoint presented |
ideas and information sometimes biased; ideas are not very clear or specifically focused; +- originality;+- individual standpoint |
no clear points or information, and ideas or opinions controversial from an ethical point of view; ideas disconnected, numerous topics with no clear conclusion; no originality, no individual standpoint |
|
|
| Context |
response to others, fits in with the context and main theme of the discussion |
+- focused on the main aim of the discussion, +- response to others |
a declaration only with no relationship to the theme or other contributions |
|
|
| Commitment |
demonstrates values behind the discussion; length & time spent on writing |
demonstrates values but which are only half-formed; writing is relatively brief and shows signs of being spontaneous and somewhat lacking in thought and analysis |
values behind the discussion not clear; time or attention paid to the writing insufficient |
|
|
| Action oriented |
positive approach & practical focus |
positive but half-hearted or undeveloped approach; good intent is shown but remains unfocused |
not practical outcome, only “chatting” |
|
|
| Constructive approach |
conclusions based on individual standpoint & derived from the opinion of the others |
Conclusions reveal an individual standpoint but need to bedeveloped further; the opinion of others is either given too much or too little prominence |
zero personal conclusions from the discussion and/or zero ability to adjust own opinion to the views of the others |
|
|
| Total (points) |
|
|
|
max 50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|