Talk:Is globalisation a neutral process?: Difference between revisions

Talk:Is globalisation a neutral process? (view source)

321 bytes added , 14:56, 2 December 2009

no edit summary

171

edits

Revision as of 14:50, 2 December 2009 (view source) Wehling (talk \| contribs) (Created page with 'Svea Wehling: Maybe the questions "Do you think there is a win-win strategy or do we just need to aim for one to make the best of a bad job?" and "Do you think a future win-win …')		Revision as of 14:56, 2 December 2009 (view source) Wehling (talk \| contribs) No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 2:		Line 2:

	Maybe the questions "Do you think there is a win-win strategy or do we just need to aim for one to make the best of a bad job?" and "Do you think a future win-win situation is realistic?" include the same idea. I would like to know what Jana Hybášková thinks about the aim of interfering with the globalisation process.		Maybe the questions "Do you think there is a win-win strategy or do we just need to aim for one to make the best of a bad job?" and "Do you think a future win-win situation is realistic?" include the same idea. I would like to know what Jana Hybášková thinks about the aim of interfering with the globalisation process.
			Secondly the question "Globalization and the conflict between Christian and Muslim society - how are these facts connected to each other?" is now up-to-date refering to the minaret controversy and the aproval of the referendum a couple of days ago. (see [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minaret_controversy_in_Switzerland])