831
edits
Three points of view on global governance: Difference between revisions
Three points of view on global governance (view source)
Revision as of 20:54, 29 August 2017
, 20:54, 29 August 2017no edit summary
(Created page with 'Going back to the paradigm outlined by McGrew, fundamental differences exist in the opinion on global governance as held by the internationalists, globalists, and transformationi…') |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
recognise the importance of both powerful states and multinational capital, saying at the same time that fundamental changes are taking places in the structures of global governance with ever increasing numbers of players asserting themselves and active – in absence of an obvious global centre – at many levels on which a permanent global discourse is held. Whereas the internationalists and the globalists emphasise a certain type of determinism, the tranformationists put the stress on the reflexivity – that is, seeking ever new models of global governance in the context of criticising the inadequacy of the existing ones. Unlike the two other views, which emphasise <u>existing structures</u>, the transformationists emphasise <u>the process</u>. | recognise the importance of both powerful states and multinational capital, saying at the same time that fundamental changes are taking places in the structures of global governance with ever increasing numbers of players asserting themselves and active – in absence of an obvious global centre – at many levels on which a permanent global discourse is held. Whereas the internationalists and the globalists emphasise a certain type of determinism, the tranformationists put the stress on the reflexivity – that is, seeking ever new models of global governance in the context of criticising the inadequacy of the existing ones. Unlike the two other views, which emphasise <u>existing structures</u>, the transformationists emphasise <u>the process</u>. | ||
[[Category:Global governance]] | |||