994
edits
New Zealand: Mining in Schedule 4 Conflict: Difference between revisions
New Zealand: Mining in Schedule 4 Conflict (view source)
Revision as of 21:07, 5 November 2013
, 21:07, 5 November 2013→Other resources
| Line 177: | Line 177: | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
<references/> | <references/> | ||
=== | ==Resources== | ||
====Web sites | ===Video clips/Documentaries=== | ||
*[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j84OKs4K2r4 TV3 News: Mining in the Denniston Plateau Likely] 9m35s | |||
*[http://tvnz.co.nz/politics-news/govt-misleading-public-mining-promise-greens-5503518 TVNZ News:Government misleading public on mining promise - Greens] 9 July 2013 3m5s | |||
*[http://tvnz.co.nz/national-news/mining-permit-protected-land-could-set-precedent-5503917/video TVNZ News:Mining permit for protected land could 'set precedent'] 10 July 2013 4m43s | |||
===Web sites=== | |||
*Schedule 4 Review. New Zealand Mineral Exploration Association. Available from http://www.minerals.co.nz/html/main_topics/whats_new_sched4.html | *Schedule 4 Review. New Zealand Mineral Exploration Association. Available from http://www.minerals.co.nz/html/main_topics/whats_new_sched4.html | ||
*Natural Riches Lie Untapped. New Zealand Mineral Exploration Association. Available from http://www.minerals.co.nz/html/main_topics/whats_new_untapped.html | *Natural Riches Lie Untapped. New Zealand Mineral Exploration Association. Available from http://www.minerals.co.nz/html/main_topics/whats_new_untapped.html | ||
*Too Precious To Mine | *[http://www.2precious2mine.org.nz/Too Precious To Mine ] | ||
*[http://watchdog.org.nz/info/fact-sheet-resources/ Coromandel Watchdog] | |||
====Academic articles==== | ====Academic articles==== | ||
*Mascia, M. B., & Pailler, S. (2011). Protected area downgrading, downsizing, and degazettement (PADDD) and its conservation implications. Conservation Letters, 4(1), 9-20. | *Mascia, M. B., & Pailler, S. (2011). Protected area downgrading, downsizing, and degazettement (PADDD) and its conservation implications. Conservation Letters, 4(1), 9-20. | ||