Students:Group Four: Robert, Lucie Č, Jana P & Jana M: Difference between revisions

The first activity to take place after our arrival was a ‘Fisher game’. This is a systemic game which aims to unveil problems with the use of common resources and time delays in complex systems.

We found the game to be very interesting and a bit ‘tricky’.  For us, the most beneficial aspect of the game was that it (similar to the workshop “Monologue/Dialogue” held in Graz) proved the importance of communication. Before we were allowed to communicate with other ‘fishing enterprises’, the amount of fish had been rapidly decreasing. Once we started to talk to other groups we were able to increase the fish stock again. It worked for two rounds. Then, we somehow stopped ‘negotiating’, which was a crucial mistake as most of the groups started to behave selfishly again.

We realized that if we would be able to communicate more efficiently, we might develop the most effective strategy which Marlene showed us afterwards (no fishing every second year and a fishing 'quota' of 8 % every other year). That constitutes an incentive for us to train our communication skills and try to reconsider our mental models.

After a very tasty lunch we participated in two presentations about old mining regions in Austria and the Czech Republic. Gerfried Tiffner talked about the city of Eisenerz, its problems and efforts to redesign it. Andrew presented the issues of the Ústí n.L. coal mining region.  

It was interesting to engage in the problem of a ‘dying city’ and hear about the various strategies to fight its ‘disease’. We consider the social-psychological dimension of the problem as probably the most difficult one. Convincing old people to leave their homes and resettle and attract youth to stay in the city must be a long and painful process. However, as this has been quite successful so far, we believe that the future of the city is promising. There are good opportunities for tourism and the projects put in place (e.g. Rostfest) seem to be very creative and beneficial.

Andrew told us a lot of remarkable facts about both Czech history and the present which unpleasantly surprised many of us. On the other hand, a few innovative and successful revitalization projects have partly improved ‘the image’ of the coal mining region. We were thinking about the issues of breaching the mining limits. From our perspective, it is useless to destroy other settlements or factories in order to enable mining in the region to continue until 2072 or even 2113. The discussion about energy security is moving forward fast and a gradual abandonment of coal power plants is a probable option to be put in place in future years or decades. Therefore, we are convinced that investments in promoting renewable energy sources and creating new job opportunities in other sectors (together with requalification of people) in the region would be much more sustainable and forward thinking choice.

The last activity scheduled on Thursday was a visit to the city of Eisenerz itself. The walk around the town surprised us quite a lot as there were not many signs that would show the problems of the city. Most of the buildings seemed to be in a good condition, although many of them were reportedly vacant. There were also a few nice shops and some interesting historical buildings like a castle, a town hall and a church. We only slightly regretted that we had not managed to visit the mine itself. But never mind, next time we will :-).