121
edits
Case study: Project ECOPROFIT: Difference between revisions
Case study: Project ECOPROFIT (view source)
Revision as of 00:40, 17 September 2012
, 00:40, 17 September 2012→Comparison of Czech and Austrian approach to SD with the focus on stakeholders in the Ústí Region and in the Styria
(→Facts) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
= Comparison of Czech and Austrian approach to SD with the focus on stakeholders in the Ústí Region and in the Styria = | = Comparison of Czech and Austrian approach to SD with the focus on stakeholders in the Ústí Region and in the Styria = | ||
== Introduction == | == Introduction == | ||
| Line 15: | Line 12: | ||
'''Population (2011):'''1,21 mil., '''Area (km2):'''16400, '''Economic growth (%, 2011):''' 3,9 | '''Population (2011):'''1,21 mil., '''Area (km2):'''16400, '''Economic growth (%, 2011):''' 3,9 | ||
'''THE PAGE UNDER CONSTRUCTION''' | |||
In Ústecký kraj we can use local sources. This area is known only for coal mining. Tourism in Ústecký kraj is one of the lowest in the Czech republic. Therefore, in our project, we expect an increase a tourism. The first step is to no-breach coal mining limits and revitalization of demaged areas. The question of breaching of mining limits and of damage next villages brings the uncertainty. People in towns dont renovate their houses and houses break up. | In Ústecký kraj we can use local sources. This area is known only for coal mining. Tourism in Ústecký kraj is one of the lowest in the Czech republic. Therefore, in our project, we expect an increase a tourism. The first step is to no-breach coal mining limits and revitalization of demaged areas. The question of breaching of mining limits and of damage next villages brings the uncertainty. People in towns dont renovate their houses and houses break up. | ||