994
edits
New Zealand: Mining in Schedule 4 Conflict: Difference between revisions
New Zealand: Mining in Schedule 4 Conflict (view source)
Revision as of 10:12, 3 May 2011
, 10:12, 3 May 2011→Introduction
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
== Introduction == | == Introduction == | ||
In March 2010, the New Zealand Government began canvassing the idea of removing land from its highly protected status under Schedule Four of the Crown Minerals Act in order to carrying out prospecting for rich mineral deposits. While releasing a discussion paper proposing a number of measures to develop New Zealand's mineral potential the Minister of Energy and Resources, Gerry Brownlee, and the Minister of Conservation, Kate Wilkinson, said a preliminary stocktake of Schedule Four land showed <ref | In March 2010, the New Zealand Government began canvassing the idea of removing land from its highly protected status under Schedule Four of the Crown Minerals Act in order to carrying out prospecting for rich mineral deposits. While releasing a discussion paper proposing a number of measures to develop New Zealand's mineral potential the Minister of Energy and Resources, Gerry Brownlee, and the Minister of Conservation, Kate Wilkinson, said a preliminary stocktake of Schedule Four land showed <ref>Media statement: Time to discuss maximising our mineral potential http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PA1003/S00313.htm</ref>: | ||
- New Zealand is mineral rich and extraction could be undertaken in an environmentally friendly way | - New Zealand is mineral rich and extraction could be undertaken in an environmentally friendly way | ||
- the mineral wealth was often highly concentrated in high conservation areas | - the mineral wealth was often highly concentrated in high conservation areas | ||