94
edits
(+typo, impr. of references) |
Cabejskova (talk | contribs) m (→Legislation) |
||
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
== Legislation == | == Legislation == | ||
Three main laws are relevant to the topic of shopping centre construction in the Czech Republic | |||
Three main laws are relevant to the topic of shopping centre construction in the Czech Republic: firstly The Construction Act No.183/2006 Coll.; secondly, Act No.334/1992 Coll. on Protection of Agricultural Soil; and lastly Act No.100/2001 Coll., containing Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA). These include the general principles of the building processes, the conditions of use of agricultural soil for other than agricultural purposes and the criteria for EIA (for example, since 2007 projects with less than 3 000 m<sup>2</sup> and fewer than 100 parking spaces can be omitted from the EIA). Complex regulations concerning specifically big shopping centres are missing though. | |||
=== Policy and Planning === | === Policy and Planning === | ||
Prague itself as a statutory town has its municipal territory divided into 57 boroughs, therefore establishing a second tier of local governments | In the Czech Republic, the responsibility for policy making rests primarily with municipal governments. The problem is that the so-called functional urban region extends the political boundaries of the core cities. In regard to Prague it is surrounded by over 170 small municipalities which are economically and legally independent units and whose decision-making process lacks wider coordination. Moreover, the metropolitan area of Prague is governed by two overlapping local body entities – Prague itself and Central Bohemia which tend to compete rather than cooperate on the question of joint development. | ||
Prague itself, as a statutory town, has its municipal territory divided into 57 boroughs, therefore establishing a second tier of local governments which takes advantage of the gained partial autonomy in decision making. However, they ought to respect two citywide planning documents – The Master Plan and The Strategic Plan. The former is a physical plan that specifies the special arrangements and land use in the medium term, while the latter specifies the long term priorities of socio-economic development. | |||
The Strategic Plan specifies controlled development and coordinated management and decision-making in order to achieve prosperity, a healthy and cultural environment, and the preservation of values which make Prague one of the most beautiful cities in the world. It is an agreement between politicians, specialists, corporate sector representatives and inhabitants. One of the five pillars focuses on the quality of the environment: “Prague endeavours to achieve a high quality of both natural and urban development, while observing the principles of sustainability. It wants to substantially reduce pollution in the city and create balance between human settlement and landscape in order to become a clean, healthy and harmonious city<ref name="Sykora" />.” Besides these two documents, Prague has worked on policies in accordance with the EU demands and has created a Regional Development Strategy which basically matches the Strategic Plan. | |||
=== A feedback on the current policy === | |||
''In this part, a resume of a feedback document - Planning Analytical Materials <ref>http://www.urm.cz/uploads/assets/soubory/data/UAP/UAP_book/kapitoly/04_kapitola_4_uap_2008.pdf</ref>- carried out by the City Development Authority Prague in 2008 is provided:'' | |||
''In this part, a resume of a feedback document - Planning Analytical Materials <ref>http://www.urm.cz/uploads/assets/soubory/data/UAP/UAP_book/kapitoly/04_kapitola_4_uap_2008.pdf</ref>- carried out by the City Development Authority Prague in 2008 is provided:'' | |||
The | The ongoing pressure on building new shopping centres and office complexes is seen as a threat to the lively metropolitan structure and to the transport network. The new European trends is to mix compact construction with lower capacity facilities. Newly constructed and reconstructed big capacities of retail outlets and offices, such as the newly opened Palladium complex, place emphasis on traffic because of parking demands and with their 100% built-up land they limit areas for new parks or greenery for the relaxation of local inhabitants and workers. Due to greater interest in ing in shopping complexes the survival of existing parks in the Prague city centre is endangered as well. | ||
A negative trend is the low support of the private sector in mettinf the financially less attractive functions of the city, which includes public facilities, greenery and recreation areas. There is also a mismatch between customer interest in traditional dispersed retail networks and the new fashion for travelling to big shopping centres on the outskirts of Prague which generates traffic congestion and so causes damage to the environment. | |||
A | A problem solvable by the Master Plan is insufficient coordination of store and logistic areas in the city surroundings. What is beyond the competences of the plan, however, is regulation of retail network in favour of smaller units, as well as the pressure of economic land use at the expense of urban aspects and environmental protection. | ||
The Planning Analytical | The Planning Analytical Materials of 2008 recommend that no more land is dedicated to big shopping centres except for newly proposed district centres. | ||
== Problems connected to commercialization – urban, environmental and social aspects == | == Problems connected to commercialization – urban, environmental and social aspects == |
edits