445
edits
Jana Dlouha (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Jana Dlouha (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
==Conflict resolution== | ==Conflict resolution== | ||
The | ===Steps=== | ||
The New Zealand Cabinet Papers and Cabinet Minutes <ref>Ministry of Economic Development: Cabinet Papers. 23 April 2010. Online WWW http://www.med.govt.nz/templates/Page____43174.aspx</ref> chronologically list the Schedule 4 stocktake discussion documents. Certain sections were withheld to protect the privacy of natural persons or to enable Ministers and/or any Departments or organisations to carry on, without prejudice or disadvantage, negotiations. | |||
* http://www.med.govt.nz/upload/72484/2-CAB-Cabinet-Paper-Release-of-a-Discussion-Paper-on-the-Stocktake-Schedule-4-of-the-Crown-Minerals-1991.pdf | * In the Release of a Discussion Paper<ref>The Chair of the Cabinet Economic Growth and Infrastructure Committee: Release of the Discussion Paper on the Stocktake of Schedule 4 of the Crown Minerals Act 1991. Online www: http://www.med.govt.nz/upload/72484/2-CAB-Cabinet-Paper-Release-of-a-Discussion-Paper-on-the-Stocktake-Schedule-4-of-the-Crown-Minerals-1991.pdf </ref>, following procedure could be traced: | ||
# | #Stocktake means that review of the areas under Schedule 4 was undertaken, inhibitors of mineral development identified | ||
#Government proposed to invest in gathering more information on mineral estate | #Government proposed to invest in gathering more information on mineral estate | ||
# | #Information obtained was released publicly to encourage potential mining investors | ||
#information | #This information should above all enable to identify areas to remove from Schedule 4 | ||
#Crown land – legislative change required (addition to Schedule 4) | #Crown land<ref>Crown-owned minerals: gold, silver, petroleum</ref> – concerning this category, legislative change was required (addition to Schedule 4) | ||
# | #Discussion paper by the Ministry of Economic Development was prepared – seeked PUBLIC FEEDBACK: | ||
## | ##proposed for removal of 7 058 ha areas from the Schedule 4 Act | ||
## | ##proposed for adding 12 400 ha to the Schedule 4 Act | ||
# | #Six week PERIOD OF PUBLIC CONSULTATION started | ||
#Leaders of affected iwi | #Leaders of affected iwi were notified prior to the public release | ||
# | #New policy proposal was released for new conservation fund (conservation benefits from the mining) | ||
# | #Required reporting back on public consultation period | ||
# | #Schedule 4 areas (incl. Coromandel Region) & restrictive measures to protect them under mining were reviewed | ||
#Press release was made publicly available when the discussion paper was launched | |||
#iwi groups have expressed number of concerns – should be contacted 24 hours before release of the paper<ref>Cabinet Economic Growth and Infrastructure Committee: Minute of decision. Stocktake of Schedule 4 of the Crown Minerals Act 1991: Release of the Discussion Document. March 2010. Online www: http://www.med.govt.nz/upload/72484/3-CAB-Cabinet-Economic-Growth-and-Infrastructure-Committee-(EGI)-Minute-(10)-4_8-17-Mar-10.pdf </ref> | |||
* http://www.med.govt.nz/upload/ | * Schedule 4 - Discussion paper<ref>Ministry of Economic Development, Department of Conservation: Maximising our Mineral Potential: Stocktake of Schedule 4 of the Crown Minerals Act and beyond. Discussion paper. March 2010. Online. WWW: http://www.med.govt.nz/upload/71967/Schedule%204%20stocktake%20-%20Discussion%20paper%20_with%20maps_.pdf </ref> claimed that the Ministry of Economic Development and the Department of Conservation: „…are now seeking input from the community before making decisions about … policy initiatives set out in this paper. These actions aim to make the most of New Zealand’s mineral resources in an efficient and environmentally responsible way. | ||
[http://www.med.govt.nz/templates/MultipageDocumentTOC____42792.aspx All of the discussion documents were published on the Ministry of Economic Development website] | |||
[http://www.med.govt.nz/templates/ | [http://www.med.govt.nz/templates/StandardSummary____42579.aspx Public feedback] was received till Wednesday 26 May 2010. What was the Government consulting on? | ||
*The Government is seeking feedback from the public on a number of areas proposed for removal from and addition to Schedule: | |||
**"No decisions have yet been made. The results of the stocktake are presented in a discussion paper, on which public feedback is being sought. After receiving and considering submissions on the discussion paper, Cabinet will decide on any changes to Schedule 4 in the third quarter of 2010 ... The Government is also seeking feedback on proposals for a new contestable conservation fund, a proposal to further investigate New Zealand’s mineral potential, and changes to Crown land access arrangements." | |||
All of the questions and answers<ref>Ministry of Economic Development: Questions and answers. May, 2010. Online. WWW: http://www.med.govt.nz/templates/Page____42795.aspx</ref> were available in a form and language that was understandable to everybody | |||
Submission questions for general public<ref>Ministry of Economic Development: Word document of submission questions. 13 March 2010. Online. WWW: http://www.med.govt.nz/templates/MultipageDocumentTOC____42580.aspx </ref> were cler, simple, and structured the answers so that they could be analysed quantitatively. | |||
===Basis of the final decisions 20 July 2010=== | ===Basis of the final decisions 20 July 2010=== | ||
Decision was based upon views of a huge number of organizations and also individuals (who were not listed in the appendix) – see | [http://www.med.govt.nz/templates/StandardSummary____44101.aspx Decision] was based upon views of a huge number of organizations and also individuals (who were not listed in the appendix) – see the Summary of submissions<ref>Ministry of Economic Development, Department of Conservation: Maximising our Mineral Potential: Stocktake of Schedule 4 of the Crown Minerals Act and beyond. Summary of Submissions. July 2010. Online. WWW: http://www.med.govt.nz/upload/73974/Summary%20of%20Schedule%204%20submissions%20July%202010.pdf </ref>. This document represents thorough analysis of the public opinion: quantitative AND qualitative one. | ||
As the | As the media release from 20 July 2010<ref>Ministry of Economic Development: Ministers' media release 20 July 2010 Hon Gerry Brownlee, Minister of Energy and Resources, Hon Kate Wilkinson, Minister of Conservation. 20 July 2010 Online. WWW: http://www.med.govt.nz/templates/Page____44104.aspx</ref> says: “Government was undertaking a genuine consultation process and had not made up its mind on any of the matters prior to the eight week discussion period which began on March 22. | ||
The government received 37,552 submissions … and the vast majority of submissions were focused on the proposal to remove 0.2 per cent of land from Schedule 4 to allow for wider mineral prospecting on those sites. | The government received 37,552 submissions … and the vast majority of submissions were focused on the proposal to remove 0.2 per cent of land from Schedule 4 to allow for wider mineral prospecting on those sites. | ||
Line 108: | Line 102: | ||
Natural Riches Lie Untapped. New Zealand Mineral Exploration Association. Available from http://www.minerals.co.nz/html/main_topics/whats_new_untapped.html | Natural Riches Lie Untapped. New Zealand Mineral Exploration Association. Available from http://www.minerals.co.nz/html/main_topics/whats_new_untapped.html | ||
--[[User:Jana Dlouha|Jana Dlouha]] 15:02, 24 January 2011 (CET) | --[[User:Jana Dlouha|Jana Dlouha]] 17:04, 24 January 2011 (CET)--[[User:Jana Dlouha|Jana Dlouha]] 15:02, 24 January 2011 (CET) |
edits