52
edits
Talk:Solar Energy: Difference between revisions
→ISPoS program - Quality rating - Jan Jelínek
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 79: | Line 79: | ||
== ISPoS program - Quality rating - Jan Jelínek == | == ISPoS program - Quality rating - Jan Jelínek == | ||
Dear Lina, | |||
I've read your essay on Solar Energy and I would like to vote on its quality. We write these ratings of quality as a part of Interdisciplinary Study Program on Sustainability and Globalisation. | |||
I was attracted by questions your work deals with and by its elaboration. Your essay is largely well-arranged which helps with orientation in different part of the text. Introduction is relatively long and should be more structured. You often pass between disparate things, which makes it difficult to follow your viewpoint hidden in the background. Part "Advantages and Disadvantages" is very well written and description of requisite and importance of solar energy is well-turned. | |||
Despite the occasional lack of additional information, work and own research behind the essay is explicit. Your work processing is unconventional, but overall rightly complements your essay focused on solar energy as part of sustainable energy. | |||
Best regards, | |||
Jan | |||